PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMX vs. GGLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMX vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF (TSMX) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMX achieves a 48.80% return, which is significantly higher than GGLL's 15.09% return.


TSMX

1D
0.30%
1M
-15.56%
6M
28.30%
YTD
48.80%
1Y
129.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
87.80%

GGLL

1D
13.48%
1M
-4.20%
6M
-0.63%
YTD
15.09%
1Y
193.37%
3Y*
59.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
49.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$205.93M$163.03M$182.59M
$51.36M$73.43M$83.39M

TSMX vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSMX
Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF
48.80%81.48%16.84%
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
15.09%123.07%24.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMX and GGLL is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024

0.40

TSMX vs. GGLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSMX
GGLL

Technology

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TSMX
100.0%
GGLL

-

Basic Materials

TSMX

-

GGLL

-

Communication Services

TSMX

-

GGLL
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TSMX

-

GGLL

-

Consumer Defensive

TSMX

-

GGLL

-

Energy

TSMX

-

GGLL

-

Financial Services

TSMX

-

GGLL

-

Healthcare

TSMX

-

GGLL

-

Industrials

TSMX

-

GGLL

-

Real Estate

TSMX

-

GGLL

-

Utilities

TSMX

-

GGLL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMX vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSMX
TSMX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GGLL
GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSMX vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF (TSMX) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSMXGGLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

4.59

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

12.34

-3.44

TSMX vs. GGLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the GGLL Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMX and GGLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSMX vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMX drawdown since its inception was -63.80%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMX and GGLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMXGGLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.80%

-52.81%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.94%

-40.32%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.40%

-25.64%

-4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.95%

-15.55%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.13%

14.99%

-1.86%

Volatility

TSMX vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF (TSMX) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) have volatilities of 27.37% and 26.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMXGGLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.37%

26.42%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.13%

49.50%

+16.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.69%

64.39%

+17.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.12%

57.22%

+26.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.12%

57.22%

+26.90%

TSMX vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GGLL's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSMX vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison

TSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than GGLL's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
4.28%4.16%3.29%2.05%0.59%
TSMX
Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF
5.70%8.01%0.53%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSMX and GGLL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMX has higher volatility (27.37%) compared to GGLL (26.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMX dropped -63.80% vs GGLL's -52.81%.

On 1-year performance, GGLL leads with 193.37% vs 129.25% for TSMX. On fees, GGLL is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, GGLL has been the lower-risk option at 26.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 193.37% return vs 129.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GGLL is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSMX.

TSMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 4.28% for GGLL.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSMX and 0.96% for GGLL.

GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMX and GGLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer