PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMG vs. NFLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMG vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMG achieves a 86.06% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -32.34% return.


TSMG

1D
-4.26%
1M
15.77%
YTD
86.06%
6M
95.35%
1Y
297.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLU

1D
-4.65%
1M
-21.10%
YTD
-32.34%
6M
-45.65%
1Y
-64.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMG vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSMG and NFLU is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.17

The correlation between TSMG and NFLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMG vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLU
NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMG vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSMGNFLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

0.79

+0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.50

-0.90

+9.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.74

-1.40

+29.14

TSMG vs. NFLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMG Sharpe Ratio is 4.18, which is higher than the NFLU Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMG and NFLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSMGNFLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18

-0.97

+5.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.69

-0.10

+1.79

Drawdowns

TSMG vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMG drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, smaller than the maximum NFLU drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMG and NFLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMGNFLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-72.10%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.29%

-72.10%

+36.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

-70.46%

+66.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-27.92%

+10.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.79%

46.27%

-35.48%

Volatility

TSMG vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a higher volatility of 23.14% compared to T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) at 14.50%. This indicates that TSMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMGNFLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.14%

14.50%

+8.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.07%

51.32%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.74%

66.63%

+5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.06%

69.18%

+11.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.06%

69.18%

+11.88%

TSMG vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSMG vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison

TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, while NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSMG and NFLU have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMG has higher volatility (23.14%) compared to NFLU (14.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMG dropped -63.67% vs NFLU's -72.10%.

On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 297.71% vs -64.65% for NFLU. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NFLU has been the lower-risk option at 14.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 297.71% return vs -64.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TSMG and 1.05% for NFLU.

TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMG and NFLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer