PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMG vs. NFLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMG vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMG achieves a 63.87% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -46.70% return.


TSMG

1D
-0.56%
1M
-4.82%
6M
39.27%
YTD
63.87%
1Y
161.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLU

1D
-1.31%
1M
-18.40%
6M
-42.23%
YTD
-46.70%
1Y
-73.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMG vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSMG and NFLU is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

0.13

The correlation between TSMG and NFLU shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMG vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLU
NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMG vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSMGNFLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.74

+0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

-0.97

+5.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.96

-1.53

+15.49

TSMG vs. NFLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the NFLU Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMG and NFLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSMG vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMG drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, smaller than the maximum NFLU drawdown of -77.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMG and NFLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMGNFLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-77.98%

+14.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.29%

-75.70%

+40.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.62%

-76.73%

+53.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.58%

-30.65%

+14.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.64%

48.21%

-36.57%

Volatility

TSMG vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a higher volatility of 34.62% compared to T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) at 23.42%. This indicates that TSMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMGNFLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.62%

23.42%

+11.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.59%

53.41%

+11.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.58%

69.01%

+10.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.22%

69.27%

+14.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.22%

69.27%

+14.95%

TSMG vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSMG vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison

TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, while NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSMG and NFLU have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMG has higher volatility (34.62%) compared to NFLU (23.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMG dropped -63.67% vs NFLU's -77.98%.

On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 161.87% vs -73.66% for NFLU. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NFLU has been the lower-risk option at 23.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 161.87% return vs -73.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 7.01%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TSMG and 1.05% for NFLU.

TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMG and NFLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer