PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLY vs. XOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLY vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLY achieves a -5.22% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 23.81% return.


TSLY

1D
1.66%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
-5.22%
6M
-7.03%
1Y
29.62%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
10Y*

XOM

1D
0.28%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
23.81%
6M
25.40%
1Y
38.24%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
23.23%
10Y*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLY vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TSLY
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
-5.22%13.62%27.83%50.69%-27.09%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
23.81%15.98%11.26%-6.26%-3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLY and XOM is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.00

The correlation between TSLY and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLY vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLY
TSLY Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TSLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLY vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLYXOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.26

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.45

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

6.56

-3.29

TSLY vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLY and XOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLY vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLY drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLY and XOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLYXOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

-62.40%

+12.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.64%

-15.69%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.52%

-18.92%

-30.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.38%

-13.68%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-10.20%

-9.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.09%

5.84%

+3.25%

Volatility

TSLY vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 9.08%. This indicates that TSLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLYXOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.68%

9.08%

+3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.97%

20.51%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.92%

24.51%

+11.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.59%

26.77%

+18.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.59%

28.20%

+17.39%

Dividends

TSLY vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

TSLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.90%, more than XOM's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TSLY
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
83.90%91.19%82.30%76.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.78%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLY and XOM have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLY has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to XOM (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLY dropped -49.52% vs XOM's -62.40%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLY and XOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer