PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLY vs. APRP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLY vs. APRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLY achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than APRP's 9.34% return.


TSLY

1D
0.10%
1M
5.56%
YTD
-1.68%
6M
-1.00%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
10Y*

APRP

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.87%
YTD
9.34%
6M
10.32%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLY vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLY
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
-1.68%13.62%64.52%
APRP
PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April
9.34%7.80%10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLY and APRP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.56

The correlation between TSLY and APRP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLY vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLY
TSLY Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TSLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLY Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

APRP
APRP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLY vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLYAPRPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

2.04

-0.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

16.51

-15.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.75

73.52

-70.77

TSLY vs. APRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the APRP Sharpe Ratio of 4.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLY and APRP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLYAPRPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

4.15

-3.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.36

-1.06

Drawdowns

TSLY vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLY drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, which is greater than APRP's maximum drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLY and APRP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLYAPRPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

-13.66%

-35.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.64%

-1.09%

-20.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.07%

-0.19%

-7.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-1.23%

-18.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.10%

0.24%

+8.86%

Volatility

TSLY vs. APRP - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) at 1.16%. This indicates that TSLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLYAPRPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.96%

1.16%

+8.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.37%

3.37%

+19.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.18%

4.33%

+33.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.50%

9.49%

+36.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.50%

9.49%

+36.01%

TSLY vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than APRP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLY vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison

TSLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.79%, while APRP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
APRP
PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLY
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
83.79%91.19%82.30%76.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLY and APRP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLY has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to APRP (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLY dropped -49.52% vs APRP's -13.66%.

On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 24.54% vs 17.90% for APRP. On fees, APRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, APRP has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 24.54% return vs 17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.

TSLY has the higher dividend yield at 83.79%, compared with 0.00% for APRP.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLY and 0.50% for APRP.

APRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLY and APRP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer