TSLY.TO vs. LLHE.TO
TSLY.TO (Harvest Tesla Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and LLHE.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds from Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLY.TO returned 38.16% vs 52.15% for LLHE.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
TSLY.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLY.TO achieves a -4.93% return, which is significantly lower than LLHE.TO's 7.99% return.
TSLY.TO
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 9.68%
- YTD
- -4.93%
- 6M
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- 38.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLHE.TO
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- 15.97%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 14.59%
- 1Y
- 52.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLY.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLY.TO Harvest Tesla Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | -4.93% | -0.09% |
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 7.99% | 32.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLY.TO and LLHE.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLY.TO vs. LLHE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TSLY.TO
LLHE.TO
TSLY.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Tesla Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (TSLY.TO) and Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLY.TO | LLHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.26 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.08 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.15 | 5.35 | -2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLY.TO | LLHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.30 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.22 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
TSLY.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLY.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than LLHE.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLY.TO and LLHE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLY.TO | LLHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -37.80% | -21.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.78% | -25.14% | -4.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.22% | 0.00% | -15.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -13.69% | -13.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.23% | 9.78% | +2.45% |
Volatility
TSLY.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Tesla Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (TSLY.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.47% compared to Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) at 9.01%. This indicates that TSLY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLHE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLY.TO | LLHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.47% | 9.01% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.65% | 29.17% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.74% | 40.35% | +5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.12% | 41.83% | +18.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.12% | 41.83% | +18.29% |
TSLY.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSLY.TO and LLHE.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
TSLY.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Dividend Comparison
TSLY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.17%, more than LLHE.TO's 20.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 20.52% | 20.89% | 7.40% |
TSLY.TO Harvest Tesla Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 38.17% | 32.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLY.TO and LLHE.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLY.TO and LLHE.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
Find the right allocation for TSLY.TO and LLHE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer