TSLW vs. XDTE
TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) and XDTE (Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLW returned 20.22% vs 25.68% for XDTE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for XDTE.
Performance
TSLW vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLW achieves a -9.26% return, which is significantly lower than XDTE's 8.83% return.
TSLW
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 9.09%
- YTD
- -9.26%
- 6M
- -9.14%
- 1Y
- 20.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDTE
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 25.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLW vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | -9.26% | 33.77% |
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 8.83% | 15.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLW and XDTE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025 | 0.52 |
The correlation between TSLW and XDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLW vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank
TSLW
XDTE
TSLW vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLW | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.43 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 3.36 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 15.35 | -14.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLW | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 2.35 | -1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.25 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
TSLW vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and XDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLW | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.80% | -19.09% | -16.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.80% | -7.68% | -28.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.23% | -0.66% | -17.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.88% | -2.32% | -10.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.77% | 1.68% | +14.09% |
Volatility
TSLW vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) has a higher volatility of 14.56% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) at 2.53%. This indicates that TSLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLW | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.56% | 2.53% | +12.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.83% | 8.28% | +24.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.52% | 10.99% | +44.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.52% | 13.85% | +41.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.52% | 13.85% | +41.67% |
TSLW vs. XDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLW vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison
TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.61%, more than XDTE's 33.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | 84.61% | 49.31% | 0.00% |
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 33.00% | 39.16% | 20.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLW and XDTE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLW has higher volatility (14.56%) compared to XDTE (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLW dropped -35.80% vs XDTE's -19.09%.
On 1-year performance, XDTE leads with 25.68% vs 20.22% for TSLW. On fees, XDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, XDTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XDTE has performed better with a 25.68% return vs 20.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSLW.
TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 84.61%, compared with 33.00% for XDTE.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLW and 0.97% for XDTE.
XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLW and XDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer