PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLW vs. WDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLW vs. WDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLW achieves a -13.00% return, which is significantly lower than WDTE's 8.25% return.


TSLW

1D
5.46%
1M
-5.73%
YTD
-13.00%
6M
-10.75%
1Y
38.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WDTE

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
8.25%
6M
8.53%
1Y
20.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLW vs. WDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSLW and WDTE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLW vs. WDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLW
TSLW Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TSLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLW Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLW Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

WDTE
WDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
WDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLW vs. WDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLWWDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.39

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.74

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.46

13.32

-10.86

TSLW vs. WDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the WDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLW and WDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLWWDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

2.00

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

1.24

-0.95

Drawdowns

TSLW vs. WDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, which is greater than WDTE's maximum drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and WDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLWWDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.80%

-15.85%

-19.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.80%

-7.65%

-28.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.60%

-2.63%

-18.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.99%

-1.82%

-11.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.80%

1.57%

+14.23%

Volatility

TSLW vs. WDTE - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) has a higher volatility of 17.07% compared to Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) at 3.15%. This indicates that TSLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLWWDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.07%

3.15%

+13.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.82%

8.80%

+25.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.30%

10.51%

+42.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.02%

11.40%

+44.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.02%

11.40%

+44.62%

TSLW vs. WDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than WDTE's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLW vs. WDTE - Dividend Comparison

TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 90.41%, more than WDTE's 32.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSLW
Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF
90.41%49.31%0.00%0.00%
WDTE
Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
32.66%35.78%51.80%16.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLW and WDTE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLW has higher volatility (17.07%) compared to WDTE (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLW dropped -35.80% vs WDTE's -15.85%.

On 1-year performance, TSLW leads with 38.71% vs 20.90% for WDTE. On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, WDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLW has performed better with a 38.71% return vs 20.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WDTE.

TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 90.41%, compared with 32.66% for WDTE.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLW and 1.01% for WDTE.

WDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLW and WDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer