TSLW vs. SIOO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) and SIOO (VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TSLW is actively managed, while SIOO is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SIOO.

Performance

TSLW vs. SIOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLW achieves a -9.26% return, which is significantly lower than SIOO's 6.19% return.

TSLW

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 9.09%
• YTD: -9.26%
• 6M: -9.14%
• 1Y: 20.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIOO

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 6.19%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLW vs. SIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	-9.26%	0.33%
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF	6.19%	0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLW and SIOO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

TSLW vs. SIOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLW

TSLW Risk / Return Rank: 15
TSLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TSLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TSLW Omega Ratio Rank: 17
TSLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
TSLW Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLW vs. SIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLW	SIOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.29	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLW	SIOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	1.51	-1.12

Drawdowns

TSLW vs. SIOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, which is greater than SIOO's maximum drawdown of -6.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and SIOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLW	SIOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.80%	-6.86%	-28.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.23%	-0.57%	-17.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.88%	-1.02%	-11.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSLW	SIOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.52%	10.36%	+45.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.52%	10.36%	+45.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.52%	10.36%	+45.16%

TSLW vs. SIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SIOO's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLW vs. SIOO - Dividend Comparison

TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.61%, more than SIOO's 7.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF	7.44%	1.27%
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	84.61%	49.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLW and SIOO in my portfolio?

TSLW and SIOO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSLW or SIOO?

On fees, SIOO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLW or SIOO?

SIOO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLW or SIOO?

TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 84.61%, compared with 7.44% for SIOO.

What is the main difference between TSLW and SIOO?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLW and 0.59% for SIOO.