TSLW vs. MSTY
TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLW returned 22.61% vs -73.07% for MSTY. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
TSLW vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLW achieves a -16.85% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -32.32% return.
TSLW
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- 6M
- -15.92%
- YTD
- -16.85%
- 1Y
- 22.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- 5.01%
- 1M
- -19.42%
- 6M
- -39.20%
- YTD
- -32.32%
- 1Y
- -73.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLW vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | -16.85% | 35.28% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -32.32% | -52.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLW and MSTY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLW vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
TSLW
MSTY
TSLW vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLW | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.75 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | -0.95 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | -1.39 | +2.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLW vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLW | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.80% | -77.40% | +41.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.80% | -77.40% | +41.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.06% | -73.39% | +48.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.89% | -28.09% | +14.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.99% | 52.39% | -35.40% |
Volatility
TSLW vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) is 20.06%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 24.03%. This indicates that TSLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLW | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.06% | 24.03% | -3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.31% | 53.10% | -15.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.52% | 64.71% | -11.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.15% | 72.33% | -15.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.15% | 72.33% | -15.18% |
TSLW vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSLW and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
TSLW vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 90.75%, less than MSTY's 275.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 275.62% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | 90.75% | 49.31% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLW and MSTY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (24.03%) compared to TSLW (20.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLW dropped -35.80% vs MSTY's -77.40%.
On 1-year performance, TSLW leads with 22.61% vs -73.07% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLW has been the lower-risk option at 20.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLW has performed better with a 22.61% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLW and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 275.62%, compared with 90.75% for TSLW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.
TSLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLW and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer