TSLW vs. GPIX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLW returned 23.67% vs 20.86% for GPIX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.

Performance

TSLW vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLW achieves a -17.23% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 10.17% return.

TSLW

• 1D: -3.72%
• 1M: -3.84%
• 6M: -16.87%
• YTD: -17.23%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIX

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 1.41%
• 6M: 8.40%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 1Y: 20.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLW vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	-17.23%	35.28%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	10.17%	15.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLW and GPIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025	0.58

The correlation between TSLW and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSLW vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLW

TSLW Risk / Return Rank: 19
TSLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
TSLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TSLW Omega Ratio Rank: 20
TSLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TSLW Martin Ratio Rank: 18

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 76
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLW vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLW	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	1.93	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	2.67	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.36	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	2.72	-2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.40	13.02	-11.61

TSLW vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLW and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLW vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLW	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.80%	-17.50%	-18.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.80%	-7.71%	-28.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.41%	-0.63%	-24.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.85%	-1.47%	-12.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.92%	1.61%	+15.31%

Volatility

TSLW vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) has a higher volatility of 20.82% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 3.62%. This indicates that TSLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLW	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.82%	3.62%	+17.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.41%	8.85%	+28.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.62%	10.90%	+42.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.26%	13.80%	+43.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.26%	13.80%	+43.46%

TSLW vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLW vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.94%, more than GPIX's 8.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	8.11%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	92.94%	49.31%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLW and GPIX in my portfolio?

TSLW and GPIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLW or GPIX?

TSLW has higher volatility (20.82%) compared to GPIX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLW dropped -35.80% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

Which ETF is better, TSLW or GPIX?

On 1-year performance, TSLW leads with 23.67% vs 20.86% for GPIX. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 3.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLW or GPIX?

Over the 1-year period, TSLW has performed better with a 23.67% return vs 20.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLW or GPIX?

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLW or GPIX?

TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 92.94%, compared with 8.11% for GPIX.

What is the main difference between TSLW and GPIX?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLW and 0.29% for GPIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.