TSLW vs. FIYY
TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) and FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for FIYY.
Performance
TSLW vs. FIYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TSLW
- 1D
- -3.72%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- 6M
- -16.87%
- YTD
- -17.23%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIYY
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLW vs. FIYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | -0.49% |
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | -2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLW and FIYY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLW vs. FIYY — Risk / Return Rank
TSLW
FIYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLW vs. FIYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLW | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLW vs. FIYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, which is greater than FIYY's maximum drawdown of -2.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and FIYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLW | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.80% | -2.51% | -33.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.41% | -2.13% | -23.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.85% | -1.47% | -12.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.92% | — | — |
Volatility
TSLW vs. FIYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLW | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.62% | 5.08% | +48.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.26% | 5.08% | +52.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.26% | 5.08% | +52.18% |
TSLW vs. FIYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FIYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLW vs. FIYY - Dividend Comparison
TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.94%, more than FIYY's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | 1.13% | 0.00% |
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | 92.94% | 49.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLW and FIYY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FIYY.
TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 92.94%, compared with 1.13% for FIYY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLW and 1.07% for FIYY.
Find the right allocation for TSLW and FIYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer