TSLI.L vs. FEPG.L
TSLI.L (IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP) and FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPG.L.
Performance
TSLI.L vs. FEPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLI.L achieves a -26.31% return, which is significantly lower than FEPG.L's -3.44% return.
TSLI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- 6M
- -24.19%
- YTD
- -26.31%
- 1Y
- -2.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.47%
FEPG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -3.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TSLI.L vs. FEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | -26.31% | 32.88% |
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | -3.44% | 8.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLI.L and FEPG.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLI.L vs. FEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
TSLI.L
FEPG.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLI.L vs. FEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLI.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLI.L vs. FEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLI.L drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than FEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLI.L and FEPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLI.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -35.75% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.91% | -28.16% | -2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.10% | -20.83% | +5.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.41% | — | — |
Volatility
TSLI.L vs. FEPG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLI.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.98% | 45.69% | -7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.08% | 45.69% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.08% | 45.69% | -1.61% |
TSLI.L vs. FEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FEPG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLI.L vs. FEPG.L - Dividend Comparison
TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.99%, more than FEPG.L's 27.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | 27.80% | 11.50% | 0.00% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | 33.99% | 55.94% | 5.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLI.L and FEPG.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FEPG.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSLI.L and 0.65% for FEPG.L.
Find the right allocation for TSLI.L and FEPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer