TSLI.L vs. 2FB.L
TSLI.L (IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP) and 2FB.L (Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while 2FB.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Leveraged 2x FB Index. TSLI.L is actively managed, while 2FB.L is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLI.L returned 45.38% vs -31.08% for 2FB.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 2FB.L.
Performance
TSLI.L vs. 2FB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TSLI.L is traded in USD, while 2FB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2FB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLI.L achieves a -6.35% return, which is significantly higher than 2FB.L's -22.15% return.
TSLI.L
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- -6.35%
- 6M
- -3.38%
- 1Y
- 45.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2FB.L
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- -22.15%
- 6M
- -17.63%
- 1Y
- -31.08%
- 3Y*
- 39.56%
- 5Y*
- -2.32%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLI.L vs. 2FB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | -6.35% | 40.52% | 28.35% |
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP | -22.15% | -1.67% | 58.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLI.L and 2FB.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLI.L vs. 2FB.L — Risk / Return Rank
TSLI.L
2FB.L
TSLI.L vs. 2FB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLI.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.96 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | -0.51 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | -0.95 | +5.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLI.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | -0.46 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.06 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
TSLI.L vs. 2FB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLI.L drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, smaller than the maximum 2FB.L drawdown of -96.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLI.L and 2FB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLI.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -96.82% | +55.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.94% | -60.88% | +35.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -61.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -96.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.21% | -49.93% | +37.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -40.77% | +28.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.79% | 32.71% | -22.92% |
Volatility
TSLI.L vs. 2FB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) is 11.68%, while Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) has a volatility of 13.01%. This indicates that TSLI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2FB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLI.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.68% | 13.01% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.22% | 50.97% | -25.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.65% | 67.03% | -29.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 84.46% | -41.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 79.30% | -36.15% |
TSLI.L vs. 2FB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than 2FB.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLI.L vs. 2FB.L - Dividend Comparison
TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.61%, while 2FB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | 71.61% | 73.68% | 19.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLI.L and 2FB.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2FB.L.
TSLI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while 2FB.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSLI.L and 0.75% for 2FB.L.
Find the right allocation for TSLI.L and 2FB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer