PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLG vs. CEFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSLG vs. CEFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSLG vs. CEFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-35.84%-26.70%-16.81%
CEFD
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN
-3.73%14.15%-3.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLG achieves a -35.84% return, which is significantly lower than CEFD's -3.73% return.


TSLG

1D
9.07%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-35.84%
6M
-39.88%
1Y
34.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CEFD

1D
1.63%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-3.73%
6M
-3.27%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSLG vs. CEFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TSLG vs. CEFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

CEFD
CEFD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CEFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLG vs. CEFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLGCEFDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.32

0.48

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

0.77

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.14

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

0.62

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.27

2.80

-1.53

TSLG vs. CEFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the CEFD Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLG and CEFD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLGCEFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.48

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.42

-0.86

Correlation

The correlation between TSLG and CEFD is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TSLG vs. CEFD - Dividend Comparison

TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%, less than CEFD's 15.83% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
10.20%6.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CEFD
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN
15.83%14.88%13.90%14.76%16.56%10.31%5.37%

Drawdowns

TSLG vs. CEFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLG drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, which is greater than CEFD's maximum drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLG and CEFD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLGCEFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.86%

-36.95%

-45.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.92%

-16.13%

-34.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.59%

-7.31%

-60.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.04%

-12.01%

-46.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.82%

3.59%

+20.23%

Volatility

TSLG vs. CEFD - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a higher volatility of 22.28% compared to ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) at 8.79%. This indicates that TSLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSLGCEFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.28%

8.79%

+13.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.35%

10.94%

+48.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.61%

20.68%

+89.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

119.00%

17.84%

+101.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

119.00%

17.41%

+101.59%