TSLA vs. MQ
TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) and MQ (Marqeta, Inc.) are both stocks. TSLA operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while MQ operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, TSLA returned 14.86%/yr vs -34.39%/yr for MQ. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSLA vs. MQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLA achieves a -9.63% return, which is significantly higher than MQ's -19.37% return.
TSLA
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -8.72%
- YTD
- -9.63%
- 6M
- -11.45%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 39.72%
MQ
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- -19.37%
- 6M
- -22.47%
- 1Y
- -30.49%
- 3Y*
- -8.87%
- 5Y*
- -34.39%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLA vs. MQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -9.63% | 11.36% | 62.52% | 101.72% | -65.03% | 75.08% |
MQ Marqeta, Inc. | -19.37% | 25.33% | -45.70% | 14.24% | -64.41% | -47.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLA and MQ is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TSLA and MQ has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
TSLA:
$1.44T
MQ:
$1.66B
TSLA:
$1.10
MQ:
$0.00
TSLA:
370.20
MQ:
797.24
TSLA:
14.66
MQ:
2.65
TSLA:
17.10
MQ:
2.24
TSLA:
$97.88B
MQ:
$651.61M
TSLA:
$18.66B
MQ:
$456.19M
TSLA:
$10.48B
MQ:
$24.62M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLA vs. MQ — Risk / Return Rank
TSLA
MQ
TSLA vs. MQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) and Marqeta, Inc. (MQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLA | MQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.89 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | -0.69 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | -1.00 | +3.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLA vs. MQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLA drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, smaller than the maximum MQ drawdown of -89.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLA and MQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLA | MQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -89.71% | +16.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.93% | -44.66% | +14.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.77% | -53.34% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -89.71% | +16.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.03% | -88.48% | +71.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.72% | -75.26% | +52.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.06% | 30.68% | -17.62% |
Volatility
TSLA vs. MQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) is 14.25%, while Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) has a volatility of 15.42%. This indicates that TSLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLA | MQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.25% | 15.42% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.73% | 29.25% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.49% | 42.58% | +1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.98% | 64.79% | -5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.14% | 64.82% | -5.68% |
Dividends
TSLA vs. MQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSLA nor MQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TSLA vs. MQ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tesla, Inc. and Marqeta, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TSLA vs. MQ - Profitability Comparison
TSLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
MQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported a gross profit of 117.59M and revenue of 165.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.
TSLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
MQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.09M and revenue of 165.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
TSLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
MQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported a net income of 7.83M and revenue of 165.80M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLA and MQ have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MQ has higher volatility (15.42%) compared to TSLA (14.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLA dropped -73.63% vs MQ's -89.71%.
TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLA and MQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer