TSII vs. TDAQ
TSII (REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF) and TDAQ (TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSII is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while TDAQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by TappAlpha. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TDAQ.
Performance
TSII vs. TDAQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -17.18% return, which is significantly lower than TDAQ's 14.87% return.
TSII
- 1D
- -8.05%
- 1M
- -11.96%
- YTD
- -17.18%
- 6M
- -23.93%
- 1Y
- 14.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDAQ
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 6M
- 13.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSII vs. TDAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | -17.18% | 35.53% |
TDAQ TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF | 14.87% | 9.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSII and TDAQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSII vs. TDAQ — Risk / Return Rank
TSII
TDAQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSII vs. TDAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSII | TDAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSII vs. TDAQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, which is greater than TDAQ's maximum drawdown of -11.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and TDAQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSII | TDAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.03% | -11.31% | -17.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.32% | -4.84% | -19.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -2.34% | -7.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.86% | — | — |
Volatility
TSII vs. TDAQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSII | TDAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.60% | 18.52% | +26.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.24% | 18.52% | +28.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.24% | 18.52% | +28.72% |
TSII vs. TDAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TDAQ's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSII vs. TDAQ - Dividend Comparison
TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.88%, more than TDAQ's 12.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TDAQ TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF | 12.14% | 4.32% |
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | 81.88% | 32.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSII and TDAQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDAQ is cheaper at 0.83% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDAQ is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSII.
TSII has the higher dividend yield at 81.88%, compared with 12.14% for TDAQ.
TSII is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TDAQ is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: REX and TappAlpha. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSII and 0.83% for TDAQ.
Find the right allocation for TSII and TDAQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer