PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSII vs. BTCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSII vs. BTCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -15.31% return, which is significantly higher than BTCL's -59.07% return.


TSII

1D
-3.38%
1M
-4.80%
6M
-15.35%
YTD
-15.31%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTCL

1D
-5.13%
1M
-6.40%
6M
-62.35%
YTD
-59.07%
1Y
-81.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSII vs. BTCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
-15.31%39.41%
BTCL
T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
-59.07%-44.88%

Correlation

The correlation between TSII and BTCL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSII vs. BTCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSII
TSII Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TSII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSII Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSII Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TSII Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSII Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCL
BTCL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSII vs. BTCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSIIBTCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.79

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

-0.97

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.83

-1.43

+3.26

TSII vs. BTCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSII Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the BTCL Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSII and BTCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSII vs. BTCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, smaller than the maximum BTCL drawdown of -84.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and BTCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSIIBTCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.03%

-84.01%

+54.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.03%

-84.01%

+54.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.60%

-82.20%

+59.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.43%

-36.56%

+26.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.58%

56.89%

-43.31%

Volatility

TSII vs. BTCL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) is 18.14%, while T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) has a volatility of 22.76%. This indicates that TSII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSIIBTCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.14%

22.76%

-4.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.45%

70.37%

-37.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.49%

88.56%

-44.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.08%

97.16%

-49.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.08%

97.16%

-49.08%

TSII vs. BTCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSII vs. BTCL - Dividend Comparison

TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.05%, more than BTCL's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCL
T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
4.14%1.70%4.35%
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
81.05%32.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSII and BTCL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCL has higher volatility (22.76%) compared to TSII (18.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSII dropped -29.03% vs BTCL's -84.01%.

On 1-year performance, TSII leads with 24.83% vs -81.18% for BTCL. On fees, BTCL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TSII has been the lower-risk option at 18.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSII has performed better with a 24.83% return vs -81.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTCL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSII.

TSII has the higher dividend yield at 81.05%, compared with 4.14% for BTCL.

TSII is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BTCL is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSII and 0.95% for BTCL.

TSII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSII and BTCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer