PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSII vs. BTCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSII vs. BTCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -35.03% return, which is significantly higher than BTCL's -58.66% return.


TSII

1D
1.37%
1M
-22.61%
6M
-32.70%
YTD
-35.03%
1Y
-2.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-8.22%

BTCL

1D
-5.62%
1M
3.27%
6M
-53.78%
YTD
-58.66%
1Y
-78.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-28.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$874.62K$895.29K$1.28M
$1.63M$1.31M$1.07M

TSII vs. BTCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
-35.03%39.41%
BTCL
T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
-58.66%-44.88%

Correlation

The correlation between TSII and BTCL is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSII vs. BTCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSII
TSII Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TSII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSII Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSII Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TSII Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSII Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCL
BTCL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSII vs. BTCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSIIBTCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.80

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

-0.96

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

-1.34

+1.04

TSII vs. BTCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSII Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is higher than the BTCL Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSII and BTCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSII vs. BTCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -44.14%, smaller than the maximum BTCL drawdown of -84.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and BTCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSIIBTCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.14%

-84.01%

+39.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.14%

-84.01%

+39.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.63%

-82.03%

+41.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-37.76%

+26.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.75%

59.98%

-44.23%

Volatility

TSII vs. BTCL - Volatility Comparison

REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) has a higher volatility of 24.75% compared to T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) at 17.89%. This indicates that TSII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSIIBTCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.75%

17.89%

+6.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.69%

68.12%

-30.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.70%

88.68%

-40.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.45%

96.26%

-45.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.45%

96.26%

-45.81%

TSII vs. BTCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSII vs. BTCL - Dividend Comparison

TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.28%, more than BTCL's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCL
T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
4.10%1.70%4.35%
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
109.28%32.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSII and BTCL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSII has higher volatility (24.75%) compared to BTCL (17.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSII dropped -44.14% vs BTCL's -84.01%.

On 1-year performance, TSII leads with -2.85% vs -78.91% for BTCL. On fees, BTCL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BTCL has been the lower-risk option at 17.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSII has performed better with a -2.85% return vs -78.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTCL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSII.

TSII has the higher dividend yield at 109.28%, compared with 4.10% for BTCL.

TSII is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BTCL is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSII and 0.95% for BTCL.

TSII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSII and BTCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer