PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSIDX vs. DBLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSIDX vs. DBLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund I Class (TSIDX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSIDX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than DBLSX's 1.17% return.


TSIDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.26%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
5.71%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*

DBLSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.27%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSIDX vs. DBLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TSIDX
T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund I Class
0.73%6.58%5.87%5.42%-5.61%0.74%0.20%
DBLSX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund
1.17%5.74%5.32%6.76%-2.69%0.70%0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TSIDX and DBLSX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.67

The correlation between TSIDX and DBLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSIDX vs. DBLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSIDX
TSIDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TSIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TSIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLSX
DBLSX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DBLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSIDX vs. DBLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund I Class (TSIDX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSIDXDBLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

2.01

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

5.97

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.05

27.36

-9.31

TSIDX vs. DBLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSIDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the DBLSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSIDX and DBLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSIDX vs. DBLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSIDX drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum DBLSX drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSIDX and DBLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSIDXDBLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-57.22%

+49.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.26%

-0.72%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.26%

-0.72%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.87%

-4.71%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-44.94%

+44.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-31.55%

+29.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

0.16%

+0.10%

Volatility

TSIDX vs. DBLSX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund I Class (TSIDX) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) at 0.36%. This indicates that TSIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSIDXDBLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

0.36%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.37%

0.92%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

1.20%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.27%

1.40%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.17%

63.96%

-61.79%

TSIDX vs. DBLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSIDX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DBLSX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSIDX vs. DBLSX - Dividend Comparison

TSIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than DBLSX's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLSX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund
4.54%4.64%5.09%4.49%2.50%1.72%2.37%3.21%2.92%2.42%2.52%2.47%
TSIDX
T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund I Class
4.81%4.96%5.14%3.61%1.90%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSIDX and DBLSX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSIDX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to DBLSX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSIDX dropped -7.87% vs DBLSX's -57.22%.

DBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSIDX and DBLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer