TSGB.L vs. WNRG.L
TSGB.L (VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A) and WNRG.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - TSGB.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while WNRG.L tracks the MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TSGB.L returned -2.68%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for WNRG.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSGB.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for WNRG.L.
Performance
TSGB.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TSGB.L is traded in GBP, while WNRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WNRG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSGB.L achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly lower than WNRG.L's 27.93% return. Over the past 10 years, TSGB.L has underperformed WNRG.L with an annualized return of -2.68%, while WNRG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.51% annualized return.
TSGB.L
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- -2.68%
WNRG.L
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- YTD
- 27.93%
- 1Y
- 37.02%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 21.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
TSGB.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSGB.L VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A | 11.74% | 19.05% | 11.64% | 13.73% | -7.64% | 23.91% | 19.21% | -70.92% | -5.43% | 8.38% |
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 27.93% | 6.65% | 3.85% | -1.65% | 64.04% | 40.05% | -32.40% | 5.71% | -9.95% | -4.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSGB.L and WNRG.L is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2013 | 0.41 |
The correlation between TSGB.L and WNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSGB.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
TSGB.L
WNRG.L
TSGB.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSGB.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSGB.L | WNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.23 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 5.81 | +4.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSGB.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSGB.L drawdown since its inception was -80.10%, which is greater than WNRG.L's maximum drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSGB.L and WNRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSGB.L | WNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.10% | -59.34% | -20.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.83% | -16.52% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -21.66% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.71% | -22.11% | +5.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.10% | -59.34% | -20.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.92% | -10.03% | -30.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.11% | -12.66% | -25.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 6.35% | -3.99% |
Volatility
TSGB.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSGB.L) is 4.04%, while State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that TSGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSGB.L | WNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 6.42% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 18.68% | -8.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.86% | 21.51% | -8.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.09% | 23.88% | -10.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.24% | 33.22% | -4.98% |
TSGB.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSGB.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WNRG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSGB.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison
TSGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while WNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSGB.L VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A | 1.85% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 2.20% | 2.28% | 4.27% | 7.57% | 9.63% | 2.18% | 1.84% |
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSGB.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSGB.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSGB.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WNRG.L.
TSGB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while WNRG.L tracks MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TSGB.L and 0.30% for WNRG.L.
Find the right allocation for TSGB.L and WNRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer