TSFIX vs. SSLCX
TSFIX (Touchstone Small Cap Fund) and SSLCX (DWS Small Cap Core Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TSFIX returned 9.57%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for SSLCX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSFIX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SSLCX.
Performance
TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSFIX achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than SSLCX's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, TSFIX has underperformed SSLCX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while SSLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.
TSFIX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 10.53%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
SSLCX
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 18.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSFIX Touchstone Small Cap Fund | 5.03% | 5.89% | 11.13% | 20.89% | -9.70% | 20.04% | 10.34% | 39.71% | -9.59% | 6.27% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 12.74% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSFIX and SSLCX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009 | 0.89 |
The correlation between TSFIX and SSLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSFIX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
TSFIX
SSLCX
TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Small Cap Fund (TSFIX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSFIX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.23 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 2.12 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | 6.69 | -3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSFIX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.30 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.37 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.52 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.39 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSFIX drawdown since its inception was -39.00%, smaller than the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSFIX and SSLCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSFIX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.00% | -63.14% | +24.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.54% | -8.78% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -17.34% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.30% | -22.57% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.00% | -48.07% | +9.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | 0.00% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -11.31% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.77% | +0.59% |
Volatility
TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison
Touchstone Small Cap Fund (TSFIX) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 4.08%. This indicates that TSFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSFIX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 4.08% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 10.00% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.82% | 14.28% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 17.37% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 21.05% | +0.71% |
TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSFIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison
TSFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than SSLCX's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
TSFIX Touchstone Small Cap Fund | 0.28% | 5.87% | 1.43% | 3.37% | 1.89% | 13.31% | 2.52% | 18.54% | 32.83% | 22.85% | 0.37% | 13.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSFIX and SSLCX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSFIX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to SSLCX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSFIX dropped -39.00% vs SSLCX's -63.14%.
SSLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSFIX and SSLCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer