PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSFIX vs. SSLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Small Cap Fund (TSFIX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSFIX achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than SSLCX's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, TSFIX has underperformed SSLCX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while SSLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.


TSFIX

1D
0.06%
1M
2.36%
YTD
5.03%
6M
6.17%
1Y
10.53%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
9.57%

SSLCX

1D
1.08%
1M
1.97%
YTD
12.74%
6M
12.70%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSFIX
Touchstone Small Cap Fund
5.03%5.89%11.13%20.89%-9.70%20.04%10.34%39.71%-9.59%6.27%
SSLCX
DWS Small Cap Core Fund
12.74%4.99%9.85%13.09%-13.53%41.16%14.65%21.72%-14.28%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TSFIX and SSLCX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009

0.89

The correlation between TSFIX and SSLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSFIX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSFIX
TSFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TSFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TSFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SSLCX
SSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Small Cap Fund (TSFIX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSFIXSSLCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.23

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.12

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

6.69

-3.06

TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the SSLCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSFIX and SSLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSFIXSSLCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

1.30

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.37

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.52

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.39

+0.13

Drawdowns

TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSFIX drawdown since its inception was -39.00%, smaller than the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSFIX and SSLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSFIXSSLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.00%

-63.14%

+24.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-8.78%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-17.34%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.30%

-22.57%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.00%

-48.07%

+9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-11.31%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

2.77%

+0.59%

Volatility

TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Small Cap Fund (TSFIX) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 4.08%. This indicates that TSFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSFIXSSLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

4.08%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

10.00%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

14.28%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

17.37%

+3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

21.05%

+0.71%

TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSFIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSFIX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison

TSFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than SSLCX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSLCX
DWS Small Cap Core Fund
1.07%1.21%1.52%0.68%1.07%1.67%0.35%0.16%5.99%5.78%0.60%8.42%
TSFIX
Touchstone Small Cap Fund
0.28%5.87%1.43%3.37%1.89%13.31%2.52%18.54%32.83%22.85%0.37%13.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSFIX and SSLCX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSFIX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to SSLCX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSFIX dropped -39.00% vs SSLCX's -63.14%.

SSLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSFIX and SSLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer