TSES vs. CRAK
TSES (Truth Social American Energy Security ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - TSES tracks the Truth Social - Yorkville American Energy Security Index while CRAK tracks the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSES charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.
Performance
TSES vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSES achieves a 20.75% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 26.54% return.
TSES
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.52%
- 6M
- 18.38%
- YTD
- 20.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRAK
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- 6M
- 25.16%
- YTD
- 26.54%
- 1Y
- 42.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.05%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
TSES vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSES Truth Social American Energy Security ETF | 20.75% | -0.71% |
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 26.54% | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSES and CRAK is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSES vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank
TSES
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRAK
TSES vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truth Social American Energy Security ETF (TSES) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSES | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSES vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSES drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSES and CRAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSES | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -58.80% | +52.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.25% | -8.64% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -12.47% | +10.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility
TSES vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSES | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.79% | 19.21% | -3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 20.71% | -4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 22.17% | -6.38% |
TSES vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSES has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSES vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison
TSES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than CRAK's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.59% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
TSES Truth Social American Energy Security ETF | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSES and CRAK have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSES.
CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.87% for TSES.
TSES tracks Truth Social - Yorkville American Energy Security Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: Truth Social Funds and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSES and 0.62% for CRAK.
Find the right allocation for TSES and CRAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer