TSDUX vs. PAIPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX) and PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund (PAIPX).
TSDUX is managed by Morgan Stanley. It was launched on Mar 8, 2016. PAIPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on May 31, 2012.
Performance
TSDUX vs. PAIPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TSDUX vs. PAIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSDUX Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund | 0.25% | 3.24% | 6.04% | 5.94% | 0.41% | -0.11% | 2.06% | 2.65% | 1.64% | 1.73% |
PAIPX PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund | 0.67% | 4.83% | 5.93% | 4.55% | -0.00% | -0.19% | 1.12% | 2.56% | 1.90% | 1.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSDUX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than PAIPX's 0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, TSDUX has outperformed PAIPX with an annualized return of 2.58%, while PAIPX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.44% annualized return.
TSDUX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 2.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.08%
- 10Y*
- 2.58%
PAIPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TSDUX vs. PAIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSDUX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than PAIPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TSDUX vs. PAIPX — Risk / Return Rank
TSDUX
PAIPX
TSDUX vs. PAIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX) and PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund (PAIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSDUX | PAIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 3.53 | -1.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 17.49 | -15.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 8.11 | -6.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | 23.60 | -19.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.51 | 95.25 | -77.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSDUX | PAIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 3.53 | -1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.87 | 1.91 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.39 | 1.83 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.38 | 1.70 | +0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between TSDUX and PAIPX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TSDUX vs. PAIPX - Dividend Comparison
TSDUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than PAIPX's 3.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSDUX Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund | 2.11% | 3.09% | 5.03% | 1.55% | 6.36% | 0.60% | 1.65% | 2.84% | 2.66% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 0.00% |
PAIPX PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund | 3.76% | 4.29% | 5.04% | 4.04% | 1.21% | 0.31% | 1.00% | 2.53% | 2.28% | 1.81% | 1.21% | 0.78% |
Drawdowns
TSDUX vs. PAIPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSDUX drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, which is greater than PAIPX's maximum drawdown of -3.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDUX and PAIPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSDUX | PAIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -3.49% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.72% | -0.20% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.72% | -1.64% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.94% | -3.49% | -0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | 0.00% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -0.15% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.16% | 0.05% | +0.11% |
Volatility
TSDUX vs. PAIPX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX) has a higher volatility of 0.39% compared to PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund (PAIPX) at 0.00%. This indicates that TSDUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TSDUX | PAIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 0.00% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.80% | 0.85% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56% | 1.29% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.11% | 1.65% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.10% | 1.34% | -0.24% |