TSDD vs. VRTL
TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while VRTL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -62.89% vs 442.54% for VRTL. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
TSDD vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 230.54% return.
TSDD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -7.92%
- 1Y
- -62.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRTL
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 230.54%
- 6M
- 160.92%
- 1Y
- 442.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -4.27% | -82.08% |
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 230.54% | 108.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSDD and VRTL is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025 | -0.38 |
TSDD vs. VRTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSDD
VRTL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSDD
VRTL
-
Basic Materials
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Communication Services
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Consumer Defensive
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Energy
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Financial Services
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Healthcare
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Industrials
TSDD
-
VRTL
Real Estate
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Technology
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Utilities
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSDD vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank
TSDD
VRTL
TSDD vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSDD | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.43 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 9.40 | -10.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 24.03 | -25.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSDD | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | 3.91 | -4.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 3.29 | -3.95 |
Drawdowns
TSDD vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than VRTL's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and VRTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSDD | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -60.58% | -38.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.12% | -47.45% | -28.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.90% | -24.11% | -74.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.21% | -15.16% | -56.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.88% | 18.53% | +41.35% |
Volatility
TSDD vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) is 24.19%, while GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) has a volatility of 33.79%. This indicates that TSDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSDD | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.19% | 33.79% | -9.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.90% | 87.48% | -32.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.57% | 114.32% | -21.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.46% | 124.39% | -9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.46% | 124.39% | -9.93% |
TSDD vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSDD and VRTL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
TSDD vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison
TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, while VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.80% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSDD and VRTL have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRTL has higher volatility (33.79%) compared to TSDD (24.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs VRTL's -60.58%.
On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 442.54% vs -62.89% for TSDD. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, TSDD has been the lower-risk option at 24.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 442.54% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSDD and VRTL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.
TSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while VRTL is Leveraged Equities.
VRTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSDD and VRTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer