TSDD vs. VRTL
TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while VRTL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -48.32% vs 124.36% for VRTL. Their -0.41 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for VRTL.
Performance
TSDD vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a 37.90% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 97.01% return.
TSDD
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- 55.85%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- YTD
- 37.90%
- 1Y
- -48.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -69.56%
VRTL
- 1D
- 5.69%
- 1M
- -29.77%
- 6M
- 60.67%
- YTD
- 97.01%
- 1Y
- 124.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 183.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $120.07M | $146.70M | $192.02M | |
| $8.31M | $6.90M | $12.17M |
TSDD vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 37.90% | -83.35% |
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 97.01% | 110.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSDD and VRTL is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025 | -0.41 |
TSDD vs. VRTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSDD
VRTL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSDD
VRTL
-
Basic Materials
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Communication Services
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Consumer Defensive
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Energy
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Financial Services
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Healthcare
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Industrials
TSDD
-
VRTL
Real Estate
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Technology
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Utilities
TSDD
-
VRTL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSDD vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank
TSDD
VRTL
TSDD vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSDD | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.25 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 1.77 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 4.90 | -5.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSDD vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than VRTL's maximum drawdown of -70.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and VRTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSDD | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -70.53% | -28.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.76% | -70.53% | +4.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.42% | -54.77% | -43.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.71% | -18.48% | -54.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.69% | 25.47% | +29.22% |
Volatility
TSDD vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) is 32.13%, while GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) has a volatility of 54.13%. This indicates that TSDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSDD | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.13% | 54.13% | -22.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.61% | 107.20% | -39.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.68% | 130.00% | -37.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.07% | 130.89% | -15.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.07% | 130.89% | -15.82% |
TSDD vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSDD vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison
TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, while VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 6.11% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSDD and VRTL have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRTL has higher volatility (54.13%) compared to TSDD (32.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs VRTL's -70.53%.
On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 124.36% vs -48.32% for TSDD. On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TSDD has been the lower-risk option at 32.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 124.36% return vs -48.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.
TSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while VRTL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSDD and 1.50% for VRTL.
VRTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSDD and VRTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer