TSDD vs. QQQD
TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSDD is actively managed, while QQQD is passively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -62.89% vs -21.80% for QQQD. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSDD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QQQD.
Performance
TSDD vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's -2.89% return.
TSDD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -7.92%
- 1Y
- -62.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQD
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -2.89%
- 6M
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- -21.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -4.27% | -74.84% | -93.30% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | -2.89% | -20.32% | -27.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSDD and QQQD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between TSDD and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSDD vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank
TSDD
QQQD
TSDD vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSDD | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.83 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.82 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | -1.23 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSDD | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | -1.08 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | -0.86 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
TSDD vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and QQQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSDD | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -49.47% | -49.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.12% | -26.65% | -49.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.90% | -47.50% | -51.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.21% | -30.34% | -40.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.88% | 17.72% | +42.16% |
Volatility
TSDD vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 24.19% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 4.76%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSDD | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.19% | 4.76% | +19.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.90% | 14.43% | +40.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.57% | 20.21% | +72.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.46% | 26.77% | +87.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.46% | 26.77% | +87.69% |
TSDD vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSDD vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison
TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than QQQD's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 4.07% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.80% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSDD and QQQD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to QQQD (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs QQQD's -49.47%.
On 1-year performance, QQQD leads with -21.80% vs -62.89% for TSDD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQD has performed better with a -21.80% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 4.07% for QQQD.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSDD and 0.57% for QQQD.
TSDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSDD and QQQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer