TSDD vs. QQQD
TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSDD is actively managed, while QQQD is passively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -48.32% vs -16.07% for QQQD. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TSDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QQQD.
Performance
TSDD vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a 37.90% return, which is significantly higher than QQQD's -3.32% return.
TSDD
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- 55.85%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- YTD
- 37.90%
- 1Y
- -48.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -69.56%
QQQD
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- 6M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- -16.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -21.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.30M | $1.19M | $1.67M | |
| $120.07M | $146.70M | $192.02M |
TSDD vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 37.90% | -74.84% | -93.45% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | -3.32% | -20.32% | -27.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSDD and QQQD is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between TSDD and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSDD vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank
TSDD
QQQD
TSDD vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSDD | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.90 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.74 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | -1.32 | +0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSDD vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and QQQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSDD | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -49.47% | -49.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.76% | -21.94% | -43.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.42% | -47.73% | -50.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.71% | -31.35% | -41.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.69% | 12.70% | +41.99% |
Volatility
TSDD vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 32.13% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 8.70%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSDD | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.13% | 8.70% | +23.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.61% | 17.91% | +49.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.68% | 22.41% | +70.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.07% | 26.98% | +88.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.07% | 26.98% | +88.09% |
TSDD vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSDD vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison
TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than QQQD's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 3.18% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 6.11% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSDD and QQQD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (32.13%) compared to QQQD (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs QQQD's -49.47%.
On 1-year performance, QQQD leads with -16.07% vs -48.32% for TSDD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 8.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQD has performed better with a -16.07% return vs -48.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 3.18% for QQQD.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSDD and 0.57% for QQQD.
TSDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSDD and QQQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer