TSCSX vs. SSLCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX).
TSCSX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 1, 1996. SSLCX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 14, 2000.
Performance
TSCSX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TSCSX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | -3.28% | 2.36% | 12.73% | 12.47% | -10.94% | 24.22% | 22.87% | 27.92% | -10.52% | 21.22% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 0.38% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCSX achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than SSLCX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCSX has outperformed SSLCX with an annualized return of 11.51%, while SSLCX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.
TSCSX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- 10.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
SSLCX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 8.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TSCSX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TSCSX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
TSCSX
SSLCX
TSCSX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSCSX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 0.50 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 0.62 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 2.03 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSCSX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.50 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.32 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.47 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.37 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCSX and SSLCX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TSCSX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison
TSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than SSLCX's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | 2.44% | 2.36% | 3.18% | 0.46% | 9.60% | 11.33% | 1.60% | 8.72% | 15.00% | 6.68% | 4.19% | 8.34% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
Drawdowns
TSCSX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCSX drawdown since its inception was -56.66%, smaller than the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCSX and SSLCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCSX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.66% | -63.14% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.31% | -10.06% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.04% | -22.57% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.63% | -48.07% | +6.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.36% | -5.55% | -5.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -11.38% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 3.09% | +0.87% |
Volatility
TSCSX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 4.67%. This indicates that TSCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TSCSX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 4.67% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 11.01% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 17.54% | +4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 17.64% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 21.06% | +1.02% |