PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSCSX vs. FTHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSCSX vs. FTHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCSX achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly lower than FTHNX's 16.92% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCSX has underperformed FTHNX with an annualized return of 12.49%, while FTHNX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.81% annualized return.


TSCSX

1D
1.55%
1M
-2.54%
6M
9.18%
YTD
15.40%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
12.49%
ALL TIME*
9.15%

FTHNX

1D
0.55%
1M
1.93%
6M
12.96%
YTD
16.92%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
13.81%
ALL TIME*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TSCSX vs. FTHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSCSX
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S
15.40%2.36%12.73%12.47%-10.94%24.22%22.87%27.92%-10.52%21.22%
FTHNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund
16.92%11.69%15.81%22.18%-7.73%30.44%10.05%27.74%-13.45%17.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCSX and FTHNX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2015

0.93

The correlation between TSCSX and FTHNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSCSX vs. FTHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSCSX
TSCSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
TSCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHNX
FTHNX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSCSX vs. FTHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSCSXFTHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.77

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

9.95

-4.11

TSCSX vs. FTHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FTHNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCSX and FTHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSCSX vs. FTHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCSX drawdown since its inception was -56.66%, which is greater than FTHNX's maximum drawdown of -37.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCSX and FTHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSCSXFTHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.66%

-37.78%

-18.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-9.44%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.84%

-24.63%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.04%

-24.63%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.63%

-37.78%

-3.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.05%

-0.51%

-3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

-5.62%

-4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

2.62%

+0.89%

Volatility

TSCSX vs. FTHNX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX) at 3.38%. This indicates that TSCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSCSXFTHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

3.38%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

10.76%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.42%

14.92%

+2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.60%

18.78%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.08%

20.07%

+2.01%

TSCSX vs. FTHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHNX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSCSX vs. FTHNX - Dividend Comparison

TSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than FTHNX's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund
0.24%0.28%7.84%1.60%0.95%3.55%0.11%0.11%0.21%0.09%0.00%15.47%
TSCSX
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S
2.04%2.36%3.18%0.46%9.60%11.33%1.60%8.72%15.00%6.68%4.19%8.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TSCSX and FTHNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSCSX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to FTHNX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCSX dropped -56.66% vs FTHNX's -37.78%.

FTHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSCSX and FTHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer