TSCDY vs. PASG
TSCDY (Tesco PLC) and PASG (Passage Bio, Inc.) are both stocks. TSCDY operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while PASG operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, TSCDY returned 18.65%/yr vs -54.00%/yr for PASG. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSCDY vs. PASG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCDY achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than PASG's -50.76% return.
TSCDY
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- 29.19%
- 5Y*
- 18.65%
- 10Y*
- 18.35%
PASG
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- -50.76%
- 6M
- -40.68%
- 1Y
- -32.71%
- 3Y*
- -32.32%
- 5Y*
- -54.00%
- 10Y*
- —
TSCDY vs. PASG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCDY Tesco PLC | 7.95% | 32.85% | 30.49% | 43.52% | -29.02% | 65.48% | 14.73% |
PASG Passage Bio, Inc. | -50.76% | 4.04% | -43.85% | -26.81% | -78.27% | -75.17% | 14.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCDY and PASG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
TSCDY:
$40.34B
PASG:
$18.63M
TSCDY:
£1.61
PASG:
-$11.85
TSCDY:
2.62
PASG:
1.58
TSCDY:
£143.57B
PASG:
$0.00
TSCDY:
£10.62B
PASG:
-$377.00K
TSCDY:
£9.46B
PASG:
-$35.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCDY vs. PASG — Risk / Return Rank
TSCDY
PASG
TSCDY vs. PASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesco PLC (TSCDY) and Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCDY | PASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.06 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | -0.41 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | -0.77 | +4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCDY vs. PASG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCDY drawdown since its inception was -76.10%, smaller than the maximum PASG drawdown of -99.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCDY and PASG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCDY | PASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.10% | -99.43% | +23.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.25% | -79.45% | +66.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.37% | -88.21% | +69.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.56% | -98.69% | +53.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.08% | -99.19% | +94.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -82.82% | +40.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.47% | 42.35% | -36.88% |
Volatility
TSCDY vs. PASG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tesco PLC (TSCDY) is 7.58%, while Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) has a volatility of 17.49%. This indicates that TSCDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PASG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCDY | PASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 17.49% | -9.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.99% | 100.45% | -82.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.62% | 122.61% | -99.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 100.91% | -77.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 99.26% | -71.43% |
Dividends
TSCDY vs. PASG - Dividend Comparison
TSCDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, while PASG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PASG Passage Bio, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSCDY Tesco PLC | 2.80% | 3.08% | 3.39% | 3.60% | 5.27% | 20.15% | 3.79% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 0.47% |
Financials
TSCDY vs. PASG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tesco PLC and Passage Bio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCDY and PASG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PASG has higher volatility (17.49%) compared to TSCDY (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCDY dropped -76.10% vs PASG's -99.43%.
TSCDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSCDY and PASG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer