PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRXS.L vs. FWRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TRXS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRXS.L is traded in GBp, while FWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FWRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRXS.L achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than FWRA.L's 10.60% return.


TRXS.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.33%
6M
-0.90%
YTD
-1.00%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
2.46%
5Y*
-1.97%
10Y*

FWRA.L

1D
-0.93%
1M
-1.51%
6M
8.83%
YTD
10.60%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TRXS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
-1.00%8.01%-0.64%0.87%
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
10.60%13.69%20.10%9.85%

Correlation

The correlation between TRXS.L and FWRA.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.07

The correlation between TRXS.L and FWRA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRXS.L vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRXS.L
TRXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TRXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FWRA.L
FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TRXS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRXS.LFWRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.34

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

3.20

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.36

11.68

-9.32

TRXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRXS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRXS.L and FWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRXS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.32%, which is greater than FWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRXS.L and FWRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRXS.LFWRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.32%

-17.88%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.09%

-6.94%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.53%

-17.88%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.54%

-2.57%

-10.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-2.04%

-9.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.90%

-0.37%

Volatility

TRXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TRXS.L) is 1.24%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that TRXS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRXS.LFWRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

3.33%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.41%

10.05%

-6.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.49%

12.38%

-7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.52%

13.05%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.87%

13.05%

-6.18%

TRXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRXS.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FWRA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRXS.L vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

TRXS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, while FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRXS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
4.29%4.11%4.30%3.44%2.42%1.59%1.77%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRXS.L and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRXS.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRXS.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FWRA.L.

TRXS.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while FWRA.L is Global Equities. TRXS.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist, while FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRXS.L and 0.15% for FWRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRXS.L and FWRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer