PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRXS.L vs. EQQU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRXS.L vs. EQQU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TRXS.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRXS.L is traded in GBp, while EQQU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQQU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRXS.L achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than EQQU.L's 15.37% return.


TRXS.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.33%
6M
-0.90%
YTD
-1.00%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
2.46%
5Y*
-1.97%
10Y*

EQQU.L

1D
-1.73%
1M
-4.34%
6M
15.32%
YTD
15.37%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
20.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRXS.L vs. EQQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRXS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
-1.00%8.01%-0.64%2.50%-16.05%-3.23%8.89%6.71%
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
15.37%11.22%28.75%48.45%-25.54%29.16%43.97%28.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TRXS.L and EQQU.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2019

-0.09

The correlation between TRXS.L and EQQU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.11 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRXS.L vs. EQQU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRXS.L
TRXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TRXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQU.L
EQQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRXS.L vs. EQQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TRXS.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRXS.LEQQU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.28

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.42

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.36

6.58

-4.22

TRXS.L vs. EQQU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRXS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRXS.L and EQQU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRXS.L vs. EQQU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRXS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.32%, smaller than the maximum EQQU.L drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRXS.L and EQQU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRXS.LEQQU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.32%

-27.75%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.09%

-11.12%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.53%

-24.26%

+16.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.78%

-27.75%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.54%

-5.16%

-8.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-5.31%

-5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

4.10%

-2.57%

Volatility

TRXS.L vs. EQQU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TRXS.L) is 1.24%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that TRXS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRXS.LEQQU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

6.03%

-4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.41%

13.58%

-10.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.49%

17.36%

-12.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.52%

20.29%

-12.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.87%

20.12%

-13.25%

TRXS.L vs. EQQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRXS.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRXS.L vs. EQQU.L - Dividend Comparison

TRXS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than EQQU.L's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.26%0.39%0.55%0.65%0.64%0.82%0.74%
TRXS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
4.29%4.11%4.30%3.44%2.42%1.59%1.77%2.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRXS.L and EQQU.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRXS.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRXS.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQU.L.

TRXS.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while EQQU.L is Nasdaq-100. TRXS.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist, while EQQU.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRXS.L and 0.30% for EQQU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRXS.L and EQQU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer