PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRXG.L vs. XUT3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRXG.L vs. XUT3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRXG.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRXG.L is traded in GBp, while XUT3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUT3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRXG.L achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than XUT3.L's 0.95% return.


TRXG.L

1D
0.23%
1M
0.98%
YTD
-0.62%
6M
-1.17%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
0.11%
5Y*
0.15%
10Y*

XUT3.L

1D
0.10%
1M
1.04%
YTD
0.95%
6M
0.23%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
1.56%
5Y*
2.96%
10Y*
2.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRXG.L vs. XUT3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRXG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist
-0.62%1.07%1.43%-2.16%-4.76%-1.80%6.08%6.04%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
0.95%-2.42%5.95%-1.10%7.87%0.32%-0.08%0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TRXG.L and XUT3.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2019

0.65

The correlation between TRXG.L and XUT3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRXG.L vs. XUT3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRXG.L
TRXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TRXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XUT3.L
XUT3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRXG.L vs. XUT3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRXG.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRXG.LXUT3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.12

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

0.85

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.12

2.31

-0.19

TRXG.L vs. XUT3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRXG.L and XUT3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRXG.LXUT3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.69

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.36

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.33

-0.27

Drawdowns

TRXG.L vs. XUT3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRXG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.41%, which is greater than XUT3.L's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRXG.L and XUT3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRXG.LXUT3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.41%

-18.58%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.60%

-5.21%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-9.27%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.24%

-16.72%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.20%

-8.02%

-13.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-8.22%

-8.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.92%

+0.41%

Volatility

TRXG.L vs. XUT3.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRXG.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) have volatilities of 1.66% and 1.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRXG.LXUT3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.65%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.66%

4.93%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.33%

6.41%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.49%

8.22%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.17%

9.43%

+0.74%

TRXG.L vs. XUT3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TRXG.L and XUT3.L have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRXG.L vs. XUT3.L - Dividend Comparison

TRXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than XUT3.L's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRXG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.28%4.25%4.24%3.55%2.38%1.60%1.94%2.07%0.00%0.00%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
2.84%2.70%2.35%1.80%1.00%2.89%2.43%1.16%1.00%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRXG.L and XUT3.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRXG.L and XUT3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

TRXG.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while XUT3.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries 1-3 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRXG.L and XUT3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer