PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRXG.L vs. PRIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRXG.L vs. PRIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRXG.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRXG.L achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than PRIT.L's -0.04% return.


TRXG.L

1D
0.23%
1M
0.98%
YTD
-0.62%
6M
-1.17%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
0.11%
5Y*
0.15%
10Y*

PRIT.L

1D
0.20%
1M
1.12%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
0.24%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRXG.L vs. PRIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRXG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist
-0.62%1.07%1.43%-2.16%-4.76%-1.80%6.08%8.04%
PRIT.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
-0.04%-1.06%2.57%-1.73%-1.79%-0.98%4.03%5.36%

Correlation

The correlation between TRXG.L and PRIT.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2019

0.96

The correlation between TRXG.L and PRIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRXG.L vs. PRIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRXG.L
TRXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TRXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PRIT.L
PRIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PRIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRXG.L vs. PRIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRXG.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRXG.LPRIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.13

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

0.86

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.12

2.05

+0.07

TRXG.L vs. PRIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the PRIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRXG.L and PRIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRXG.LPRIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.74

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.08

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.09

-0.03

Drawdowns

TRXG.L vs. PRIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRXG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.41%, which is greater than PRIT.L's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRXG.L and PRIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRXG.LPRIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.41%

-20.06%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.60%

-5.19%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-8.33%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.24%

-16.09%

-0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.20%

-14.86%

-6.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-12.54%

-4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.19%

+0.14%

Volatility

TRXG.L vs. PRIT.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRXG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L) at 1.51%. This indicates that TRXG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRXG.LPRIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.51%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.66%

4.44%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.33%

6.04%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.49%

8.89%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.17%

9.33%

+0.84%

TRXG.L vs. PRIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRXG.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIT.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRXG.L vs. PRIT.L - Dividend Comparison

TRXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than PRIT.L's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PRIT.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
3.22%3.22%2.79%2.34%1.87%1.74%2.11%0.00%
TRXG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.28%4.25%4.24%3.55%2.38%1.60%1.94%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TRXG.L and PRIT.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRIT.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIT.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for TRXG.L.

TRXG.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while PRIT.L tracks Solactive US Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRXG.L and 0.05% for PRIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRXG.L and PRIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer