TRXAX vs. WARAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX).
TRXAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Jul 28, 2011. WARAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Feb 29, 2012.
Performance
TRXAX vs. WARAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRXAX vs. WARAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund | 2.23% | 16.16% | 4.67% | 5.23% | -7.44% | 9.65% | 3.62% | 11.51% | -3.30% | 11.12% |
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund | 14.79% | 8.07% | 5.93% | 12.53% | -2.75% | 2.25% | -3.25% | 11.65% | -5.78% | 12.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRXAX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than WARAX's 14.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRXAX having a 5.41% annualized return and WARAX not far ahead at 5.60%.
TRXAX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 14.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.90%
- 10Y*
- 5.41%
WARAX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 6M
- 17.82%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRXAX vs. WARAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRXAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than WARAX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRXAX vs. WARAX — Risk / Return Rank
TRXAX
WARAX
TRXAX vs. WARAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRXAX | WARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 2.45 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 3.28 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.45 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 4.34 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 10.20 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRXAX | WARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.45 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.93 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.71 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.59 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRXAX and WARAX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TRXAX vs. WARAX - Dividend Comparison
TRXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than WARAX's 1.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund | 2.28% | 2.45% | 4.93% | 5.12% | 0.83% | 6.76% | 1.91% | 2.66% | 8.34% | 3.46% | 3.55% | 1.59% |
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund | 1.74% | 2.00% | 10.90% | 2.80% | 2.34% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.38% | 2.66% | 1.77% | 0.76% | 1.35% |
Drawdowns
TRXAX vs. WARAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRXAX drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum WARAX drawdown of -23.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRXAX and WARAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRXAX | WARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -23.16% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.60% | -5.06% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.03% | -14.64% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.50% | -23.16% | +2.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -0.24% | -4.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -3.88% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 2.15% | -0.77% |
Volatility
TRXAX vs. WARAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) is 2.51%, while Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that TRXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WARAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRXAX | WARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 3.66% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.86% | 7.21% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 8.83% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.88% | 7.60% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.26% | 7.91% | +0.35% |