TRXAX vs. MLXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX).
TRXAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Jul 28, 2011. MLXIX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 21, 2014.
Performance
TRXAX vs. MLXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRXAX vs. MLXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund | 2.23% | 16.16% | 4.67% | 5.23% | -7.44% | 9.65% | 3.62% | 11.51% | -3.30% | 11.12% |
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 35.24% | -8.56% | 45.26% | 15.34% | 27.02% | 42.04% | -20.02% | 12.05% | -18.48% | -13.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRXAX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than MLXIX's 35.24% return. Over the past 10 years, TRXAX has underperformed MLXIX with an annualized return of 5.41%, while MLXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return.
TRXAX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 14.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.90%
- 10Y*
- 5.41%
MLXIX
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 14.05%
- YTD
- 35.24%
- 6M
- 26.46%
- 1Y
- 21.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.68%
- 5Y*
- 25.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRXAX vs. MLXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRXAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than MLXIX's 1.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRXAX vs. MLXIX — Risk / Return Rank
TRXAX
MLXIX
TRXAX vs. MLXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRXAX | MLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 0.91 | +1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 1.26 | +1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.19 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 1.19 | +1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 2.36 | +8.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRXAX | MLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 0.91 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 1.15 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.53 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.22 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRXAX and MLXIX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TRXAX vs. MLXIX - Dividend Comparison
TRXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than MLXIX's 6.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund | 2.28% | 2.45% | 4.93% | 5.12% | 0.83% | 6.76% | 1.91% | 2.66% | 8.34% | 3.46% | 3.55% | 1.59% |
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.52% | 8.26% | 5.02% | 6.67% | 7.15% | 8.26% | 14.52% | 15.93% | 15.62% | 11.37% | 8.76% | 11.47% |
Drawdowns
TRXAX vs. MLXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRXAX drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum MLXIX drawdown of -76.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRXAX and MLXIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRXAX | MLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -76.78% | +56.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.60% | -16.50% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.03% | -22.14% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.50% | -72.63% | +52.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -1.51% | -3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -23.47% | +20.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 8.33% | -6.95% |
Volatility
TRXAX vs. MLXIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) is 2.51%, while Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that TRXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRXAX | MLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 6.04% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.86% | 13.30% | -8.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 23.26% | -15.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.88% | 22.13% | -14.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.26% | 28.33% | -20.07% |