PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRXAX vs. HIIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRXAX vs. HIIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund (HIIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRXAX achieves a 6.01% return, which is significantly higher than HIIFX's 3.38% return. Over the past 10 years, TRXAX has underperformed HIIFX with an annualized return of 5.61%, while HIIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.79% annualized return.


TRXAX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.58%
YTD
6.01%
6M
6.30%
1Y
14.09%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
5.61%

HIIFX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.05%
YTD
3.38%
6M
3.82%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
7.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRXAX vs. HIIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRXAX
Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund
6.01%16.16%4.67%5.23%-7.44%9.65%3.62%11.51%-3.30%11.12%
HIIFX
Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund
3.38%15.31%8.33%16.44%-13.48%8.03%10.00%8.36%-1.46%9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between TRXAX and HIIFX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2011

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRXAX vs. HIIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRXAX
TRXAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TRXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TRXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

HIIFX
HIIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HIIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HIIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRXAX vs. HIIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund (HIIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRXAXHIIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.58

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

4.28

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

14.15

-5.57

TRXAX vs. HIIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRXAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the HIIFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRXAX and HIIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRXAXHIIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

3.01

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.89

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

1.31

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.21

+0.49

Drawdowns

TRXAX vs. HIIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRXAX drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum HIIFX drawdown of -51.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRXAX and HIIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRXAXHIIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-51.29%

+30.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.60%

-4.89%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.04%

-8.46%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.03%

-18.58%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.50%

-18.58%

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

0.00%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-15.27%

+12.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.48%

+0.16%

Volatility

TRXAX vs. HIIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) is 1.36%, while Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund (HIIFX) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that TRXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRXAXHIIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.47%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.82%

4.52%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.09%

6.98%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.85%

6.51%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.26%

5.98%

+2.28%

TRXAX vs. HIIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRXAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than HIIFX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRXAX vs. HIIFX - Dividend Comparison

TRXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than HIIFX's 5.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIIFX
Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund
5.47%4.65%6.03%6.55%6.64%4.03%5.00%5.37%5.61%5.50%6.81%12.14%
TRXAX
Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund
2.20%2.45%4.93%5.12%0.83%6.76%1.91%2.66%8.34%3.46%3.55%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRXAX and HIIFX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIIFX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to TRXAX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRXAX dropped -20.50% vs HIIFX's -51.29%.

HIIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRXAX and HIIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer