TRX vs. AVUV
TRX (Tanzanian Gold Corporation) is a stock, while AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) is Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Over the past 5 years, TRX returned 8.33%/yr vs 14.00%/yr for AVUV. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRX vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRX achieves a -24.64% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 24.50% return.
TRX
- 1D
- -7.08%
- 1M
- -29.68%
- 6M
- -30.59%
- YTD
- -24.64%
- 1Y
- 101.74%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- -4.06%
AVUV
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- YTD
- 24.50%
- 1Y
- 37.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.00%
- 10Y*
- —
TRX vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRX Tanzanian Gold Corporation | -24.64% | 199.97% | -19.24% | 12.37% | -14.54% | -40.00% | 6.40% | -22.50% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 24.50% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRX and AVUV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.13 |
The correlation between TRX and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRX vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
TRX
AVUV
TRX vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tanzanian Gold Corporation (TRX) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 4.72 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | 14.06 | -10.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRX vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRX drawdown since its inception was -97.69%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRX and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.69% | -49.42% | -48.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.17% | -7.95% | -60.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.17% | -28.79% | -39.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.17% | -28.79% | -39.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.18% | 0.00% | -92.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.21% | -7.83% | -64.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.51% | 2.66% | +27.85% |
Volatility
TRX vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
Tanzanian Gold Corporation (TRX) has a higher volatility of 19.37% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 2.95%. This indicates that TRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.37% | 2.95% | +16.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.40% | 11.11% | +62.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.97% | 17.15% | +74.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.82% | 22.51% | +38.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.28% | 28.10% | +42.18% |
Dividends
TRX vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
TRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.24% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% |
TRX Tanzanian Gold Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRX and AVUV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRX has higher volatility (19.37%) compared to AVUV (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRX dropped -97.69% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRX and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer