TRULX vs. QKACX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TRULX (T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core) and QKACX (Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, TRULX returned 13.47%/yr vs 16.88%/yr for QKACX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRULX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for QKACX.

Performance

TRULX vs. QKACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRULX achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than QKACX's 6.95% return. Over the past 10 years, TRULX has underperformed QKACX with an annualized return of 13.47%, while QKACX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.88% annualized return.

TRULX

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 2.25%
• YTD: 8.51%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 19.72%
• 3Y*: 19.57%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: 13.47%

QKACX

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 6M: 8.31%
• 1Y: 22.40%
• 3Y*: 24.91%
• 5Y*: 15.66%
• 10Y*: 16.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRULX vs. QKACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRULX T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core	8.51%	12.80%	22.97%	22.61%	-15.14%	25.57%	15.57%	29.51%	-3.38%	19.85%
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	6.95%	21.16%	31.05%	23.55%	-14.17%	31.45%	22.00%	26.88%	-2.65%	21.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TRULX and QKACX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2009	0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between TRULX and QKACX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TRULX vs. QKACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRULX

TRULX Risk / Return Rank: 41
TRULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
TRULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
TRULX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TRULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
TRULX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

QKACX

QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 53
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRULX vs. QKACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRULX	QKACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.95	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.85	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.41	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	2.70	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.46	12.64	-2.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRULX vs. QKACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRULX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the QKACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRULX and QKACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRULX	QKACX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	1.95	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.90	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.90	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.48	+0.39

Drawdowns

TRULX vs. QKACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRULX drawdown since its inception was -33.68%, smaller than the maximum QKACX drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRULX and QKACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRULX	QKACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.68%	-60.51%	+26.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.57%	-8.66%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.23%	-19.42%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.91%	-23.05%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.68%	-36.47%	+2.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-1.02%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.64%	-11.20%	+7.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	1.85%	+0.05%

Volatility

TRULX vs. QKACX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRULX	QKACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	2.72%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.41%	9.47%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.97%	11.99%	-1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.96%	17.37%	-1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	18.70%	-1.71%

TRULX vs. QKACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRULX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than QKACX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRULX vs. QKACX - Dividend Comparison

TRULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than QKACX's 4.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	4.42%	4.72%	8.90%	1.45%	11.20%	17.85%	3.09%	3.41%	8.83%	0.74%	0.00%	0.52%
TRULX T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core	7.16%	7.77%	6.66%	0.45%	4.27%	7.28%	0.85%	3.55%	7.89%	2.10%	0.94%	5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRULX and QKACX in my portfolio?

TRULX and QKACX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRULX or QKACX?

TRULX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to QKACX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRULX dropped -33.68% vs QKACX's -60.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QKACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.