PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRULX vs. FLCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRULX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRULX achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than FLCPX's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, TRULX has underperformed FLCPX with an annualized return of 13.53%, while FLCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.67% annualized return.


TRULX

1D
0.36%
1M
3.45%
YTD
9.11%
6M
8.76%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
13.53%

FLCPX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.81%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.75%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
15.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRULX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRULX
T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core
9.11%12.80%22.97%22.61%-15.14%25.57%15.57%29.51%-3.38%19.85%
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
11.72%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%28.61%18.24%31.59%-4.38%21.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TRULX and FLCPX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2016

0.97

The correlation between TRULX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRULX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRULX
TRULX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TRULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRULX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TRULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRULX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRULX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRULXFLCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.38

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

15.75

-4.66

TRULX vs. FLCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRULX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FLCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRULX and FLCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRULXFLCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.53

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.84

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.87

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.92

-0.05

Drawdowns

TRULX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRULX drawdown since its inception was -33.68%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCPX drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRULX and FLCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRULXFLCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.68%

-33.87%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-8.89%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-18.76%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-24.40%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.68%

-33.87%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-4.19%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.90%

0.00%

Volatility

TRULX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRULXFLCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

2.82%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

8.98%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

11.86%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

17.06%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

18.16%

-1.17%

TRULX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRULX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRULX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

TRULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than FLCPX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.50%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%0.00%
TRULX
T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core
7.12%7.77%6.66%0.45%4.27%7.28%0.85%3.55%7.89%2.10%0.94%5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TRULX and FLCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRULX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to FLCPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRULX dropped -33.68% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRULX and FLCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer