PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRU vs. DFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRU vs. DFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TransUnion (TRU) and Discover Financial Services (DFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TRU

1D
-5.91%
1M
0.67%
YTD
-18.80%
6M
-16.50%
1Y
-18.05%
3Y*
-1.77%
5Y*
-7.58%
10Y*
8.20%

DFS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRU vs. DFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRU
TransUnion
-18.80%-7.01%35.59%21.85%-51.90%19.91%16.30%51.34%3.69%77.69%
DFS
Discover Financial Services
0.00%15.88%57.32%18.20%-13.55%29.78%10.13%46.94%-21.80%8.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TRU and DFS is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015

0.39

The correlation between TRU and DFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRU:

$4.73B

DFS:

$10.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRU:

$2.49B

DFS:

$7.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

TRU:

$1.46B

DFS:

$4.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRU vs. DFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRU
TRU Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TRU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRU Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRU Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

DFS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRU vs. DFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransUnion (TRU) and Discover Financial Services (DFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRUDFSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

TRU vs. DFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRUDFSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

Drawdowns

TRU vs. DFS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRUDFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.16%

Volatility

TRU vs. DFS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRUDFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.69%

Dividends

TRU vs. DFS - Dividend Comparison

TRU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while DFS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFS
Discover Financial Services
0.00%0.35%1.62%2.40%2.35%1.63%1.94%1.98%2.54%1.69%1.61%2.01%
TRU
TransUnion
0.69%0.54%0.45%0.61%0.70%0.30%0.30%0.35%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TRU vs. DFS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TransUnion and Discover Financial Services. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
1.25B
5.49B
(TRU) Total Revenue
(DFS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TRU and DFS have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRU and DFS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer