PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRSX.L vs. U10C.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRSX.L vs. U10C.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) and Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRSX.L achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly higher than U10C.L's -1.06% return.


TRSX.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
-0.98%
10Y*

U10C.L

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
-0.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRSX.L vs. U10C.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TRSX.L
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-0.05%8.02%-0.62%3.29%-14.99%-1.27%
U10C.L
Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc
-1.06%5.51%-5.71%2.61%-28.28%-1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSX.L and U10C.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021

0.33

Over the past year, TRSX.L and U10C.L have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRSX.L vs. U10C.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRSX.L
TRSX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

U10C.L
U10C.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
U10C.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U10C.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
U10C.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
U10C.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
U10C.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRSX.L vs. U10C.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) and Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRSX.LU10C.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.08

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

0.60

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

1.59

+2.60

TRSX.L vs. U10C.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the U10C.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSX.L and U10C.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRSX.LU10C.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.48

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.50

+0.64

Drawdowns

TRSX.L vs. U10C.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSX.L drawdown since its inception was -23.50%, smaller than the maximum U10C.L drawdown of -40.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSX.L and U10C.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRSX.LU10C.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.50%

-40.18%

+16.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-6.99%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.27%

-17.05%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.55%

-30.22%

+19.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-27.31%

+16.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.65%

-0.40%

Volatility

TRSX.L vs. U10C.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) is 1.87%, while Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that TRSX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than U10C.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRSX.LU10C.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

3.14%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.46%

6.07%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.73%

8.82%

-3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

13.98%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.53%

13.98%

-0.45%

TRSX.L vs. U10C.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRSX.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than U10C.L's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRSX.L vs. U10C.L - Dividend Comparison

TRSX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while U10C.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TRSX.L
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.09%3.93%3.59%2.71%1.65%1.02%1.56%
U10C.L
Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRSX.L and U10C.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRSX.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRSX.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for U10C.L.

TRSX.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while U10C.L tracks Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TRSX.L and 0.06% for U10C.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRSX.L and U10C.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer