PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRSX.L vs. PR1T.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRSX.L vs. PR1T.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRSX.L achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than PR1T.L's 1.40% return.


TRSX.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
-0.29%
6M
-0.96%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
2.45%
5Y*
-1.03%
10Y*

PR1T.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRSX.L vs. PR1T.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TRSX.L
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-0.29%8.02%-0.62%3.29%-14.99%-2.94%-1.20%
PR1T.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)
1.40%4.22%5.20%4.83%0.61%0.09%-0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSX.L and PR1T.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2020

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRSX.L vs. PR1T.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRSX.L
TRSX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1T.L
PR1T.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRSX.L vs. PR1T.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRSX.LPR1T.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-34.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

9.45

-8.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

67.85

-66.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

516.07

-511.49

TRSX.L vs. PR1T.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio of 12.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSX.L and PR1T.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRSX.LPR1T.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

12.94

-11.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

8.36

-8.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

7.39

-7.26

Drawdowns

TRSX.L vs. PR1T.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSX.L drawdown since its inception was -23.50%, which is greater than PR1T.L's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSX.L and PR1T.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRSX.LPR1T.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.50%

-0.56%

-22.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-0.06%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.35%

-0.06%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

-0.56%

-20.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.76%

-0.03%

-10.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-0.05%

-10.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

0.01%

+2.23%

Volatility

TRSX.L vs. PR1T.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L) at 0.07%. This indicates that TRSX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1T.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRSX.LPR1T.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

0.07%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.46%

0.21%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.74%

0.30%

+5.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

0.39%

+13.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.54%

0.38%

+13.16%

TRSX.L vs. PR1T.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TRSX.L and PR1T.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRSX.L vs. PR1T.L - Dividend Comparison

TRSX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, while PR1T.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
PR1T.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRSX.L
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.10%3.93%3.59%2.71%1.65%1.02%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRSX.L and PR1T.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRSX.L and PR1T.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

TRSX.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while PR1T.L tracks Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRSX.L and PR1T.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer