PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRSX.L vs. J13U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRSX.L vs. J13U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (Acc) (J13U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRSX.L is traded in USD, while J13U.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the J13U.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRSX.L achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than J13U.L's 0.38% return.


TRSX.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
-0.98%
10Y*

J13U.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.95%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRSX.L vs. J13U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TRSX.L
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-0.05%8.02%-0.62%3.29%-14.99%-2.94%9.77%6.30%2.12%
J13U.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (Acc)
0.38%5.40%3.96%3.54%-3.82%-0.28%2.73%4.45%1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSX.L and J13U.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2018

0.06

The correlation between TRSX.L and J13U.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRSX.L vs. J13U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRSX.L
TRSX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

J13U.L
J13U.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
J13U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
J13U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
J13U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
J13U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
J13U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRSX.L vs. J13U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (Acc) (J13U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRSX.LJ13U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.14

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

2.91

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

8.70

-4.51

TRSX.L vs. J13U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the J13U.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSX.L and J13U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRSX.LJ13U.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.79

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.35

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.44

-0.29

Drawdowns

TRSX.L vs. J13U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSX.L drawdown since its inception was -23.50%, which is greater than J13U.L's maximum drawdown of -7.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSX.L and J13U.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRSX.LJ13U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.50%

-7.29%

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-1.14%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.35%

-1.56%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

-6.93%

-14.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.55%

-0.43%

-10.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-1.48%

-9.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

0.38%

+1.87%

Volatility

TRSX.L vs. J13U.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) has a higher volatility of 1.87% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (Acc) (J13U.L) at 1.41%. This indicates that TRSX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than J13U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRSX.LJ13U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

1.41%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.46%

3.41%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.73%

4.20%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

5.06%

+8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.53%

5.12%

+8.41%

TRSX.L vs. J13U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRSX.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than J13U.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRSX.L vs. J13U.L - Dividend Comparison

TRSX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while J13U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
J13U.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.18%
TRSX.L
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.09%3.93%3.59%2.71%1.65%1.02%1.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRSX.L and J13U.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRSX.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRSX.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for J13U.L.

TRSX.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while J13U.L tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond US 1-3 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TRSX.L and 0.07% for J13U.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRSX.L and J13U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer