TRSTX vs. FAPGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRSTX (T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund Class I) and FAPGX (Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, TRSTX returned 5.74%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for FAPGX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRSTX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FAPGX.

Performance

TRSTX vs. FAPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund Class I (TRSTX) and Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRSTX achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than FAPGX's 1.39% return.

TRSTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 2.04%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 5.74%
• 5Y*: 3.55%
• 10Y*: —

FAPGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 4.11%
• 3Y*: 4.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRSTX vs. FAPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TRSTX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund Class I	1.64%	5.34%	6.41%	5.89%	-0.21%
FAPGX Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond	1.39%	4.57%	5.32%	5.28%	0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSTX and FAPGX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2022	0.35

The correlation between TRSTX and FAPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TRSTX vs. FAPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRSTX

TRSTX Risk / Return Rank: 98
TRSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
TRSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
TRSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
TRSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
TRSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FAPGX

FAPGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FAPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FAPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FAPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FAPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FAPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRSTX vs. FAPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund Class I (TRSTX) and Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRSTX	FAPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.15	3.69	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	9.73	9.70	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.91	3.24	+1.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	24.71	14.05	+10.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	55.77	64.52	-8.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRSTX vs. FAPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is comparable to the FAPGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSTX and FAPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRSTX	FAPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.15	3.69	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.03	3.88	-1.85

Drawdowns

TRSTX vs. FAPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSTX drawdown since its inception was -4.34%, which is greater than FAPGX's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSTX and FAPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRSTX	FAPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.34%	-0.49%	-3.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.20%	-0.29%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.59%	-0.39%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.30%	-0.06%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.09%	0.06%	+0.03%

Volatility

TRSTX vs. FAPGX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund Class I (TRSTX) has a higher volatility of 0.37% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX) at 0.26%. This indicates that TRSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRSTX	FAPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.37%	0.26%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.19%	0.83%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54%	1.12%	+0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.66%	1.07%	+0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.63%	1.07%	+0.56%

TRSTX vs. FAPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRSTX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FAPGX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRSTX vs. FAPGX - Dividend Comparison

TRSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, which matches FAPGX's 4.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FAPGX Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond	4.63%	4.40%	4.81%	3.44%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRSTX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund Class I	4.59%	4.79%	5.19%	3.46%	1.61%	1.28%	1.94%	2.78%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRSTX and FAPGX in my portfolio?

TRSTX and FAPGX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRSTX or FAPGX?

TRSTX has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to FAPGX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRSTX dropped -4.34% vs FAPGX's -0.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 3.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.