TRRNX vs. ITDF
TRRNX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2055 Fund) and ITDF (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past year, TRRNX returned 21.43% vs 27.50% for ITDF. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRRNX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for ITDF.
Performance
TRRNX vs. ITDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TRRNX having a 11.87% return and ITDF slightly lower at 11.50%.
TRRNX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 21.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
ITDF
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- 27.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRRNX vs. ITDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TRRNX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2055 Fund | 11.87% | 14.33% | 14.24% | 11.92% |
ITDF Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF | 11.50% | 20.86% | 16.15% | 12.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRRNX and ITDF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between TRRNX and ITDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRRNX vs. ITDF — Risk / Return Rank
TRRNX
ITDF
TRRNX vs. ITDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2055 Fund (TRRNX) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRRNX | ITDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.97 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | 13.13 | -3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRRNX | ITDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.29 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.76 | -1.29 |
Drawdowns
TRRNX vs. ITDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRRNX drawdown since its inception was -53.59%, which is greater than ITDF's maximum drawdown of -15.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRNX and ITDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRRNX | ITDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.59% | -15.67% | -37.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -9.32% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.76% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -1.51% | -6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.10% | +0.23% |
Volatility
TRRNX vs. ITDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2055 Fund (TRRNX) is 3.51%, while Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that TRRNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRRNX | ITDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 3.79% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 9.67% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.55% | 12.04% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 13.88% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 13.88% | +1.68% |
TRRNX vs. ITDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRRNX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ITDF's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRRNX vs. ITDF - Dividend Comparison
TRRNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDF Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF | 1.48% | 1.65% | 1.55% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRRNX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2055 Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.77% | 3.81% | 7.01% | 5.83% | 3.40% | 5.41% | 7.55% | 2.12% | 2.62% | 3.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TRRNX and ITDF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITDF has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to TRRNX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRNX dropped -53.59% vs ITDF's -15.67%.
ITDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRRNX and ITDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer