PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRLX vs. PPLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRLX vs. PPLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund (TRRLX) and Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRLX achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly higher than PPLIX's 9.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRRLX having a 11.20% annualized return and PPLIX not far ahead at 11.60%.


TRRLX

1D
0.47%
1M
4.68%
YTD
11.85%
6M
8.26%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
17.36%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
11.20%

PPLIX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.65%
YTD
9.45%
6M
9.80%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRLX vs. PPLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRLX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund
11.85%14.54%14.22%20.87%-19.22%17.50%18.46%25.39%-7.62%20.79%
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.45%17.55%19.12%20.36%-18.78%17.04%16.56%26.67%-8.74%22.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRLX and PPLIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2014

0.96

The correlation between TRRLX and PPLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRLX vs. PPLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRLX
TRRLX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TRRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PPLIX
PPLIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PPLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRLX vs. PPLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund (TRRLX) and Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRRLXPPLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.68

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.63

12.05

-2.43

TRRLX vs. PPLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the PPLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRLX and PPLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRRLXPPLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.99

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.62

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.75

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.46

+0.17

Drawdowns

TRRLX vs. PPLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRLX drawdown since its inception was -32.52%, smaller than the maximum PPLIX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRLX and PPLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRLXPPLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.52%

-55.61%

+23.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-8.57%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-15.59%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-26.85%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.52%

-32.67%

+0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-8.30%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.90%

+0.42%

Volatility

TRRLX vs. PPLIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund (TRRLX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) at 3.25%. This indicates that TRRLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRLXPPLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

3.25%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

9.22%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

11.56%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

15.47%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

15.59%

-0.07%

TRRLX vs. PPLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRLX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than PPLIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRLX vs. PPLIX - Dividend Comparison

TRRLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.09%9.95%11.56%4.41%9.40%8.04%5.23%7.16%8.64%5.12%4.82%6.07%
TRRLX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund
0.00%0.00%1.74%3.29%5.75%4.19%2.38%4.33%5.39%1.58%1.58%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TRRLX and PPLIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRRLX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to PPLIX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRLX dropped -32.52% vs PPLIX's -55.61%.

PPLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRLX and PPLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer