PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRJX vs. TRBCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRJX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRJX achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRJX has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 9.82%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.


TRRJX

1D
0.39%
1M
3.73%
YTD
9.32%
6M
4.93%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
9.82%

TRBCX

1D
-0.69%
1M
5.17%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.64%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
28.80%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
17.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRJX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
9.32%10.96%11.99%18.14%-17.96%15.21%17.04%23.72%-6.95%20.89%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
5.48%18.78%48.46%49.42%-38.57%17.54%34.73%29.97%2.00%36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRJX and TRBCX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2004

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between TRRJX and TRBCX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRJX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRJX
TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

TRBCX
TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRJX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRRJXTRBCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

1.37

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.19

1.87

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.25

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

1.34

+0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.96

4.54

+3.42

TRRJX vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRJX and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRRJXTRBCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.37

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.78

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.60

-0.09

Drawdowns

TRRJX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRJX drawdown since its inception was -53.57%, roughly equal to the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRJX and TRBCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRJXTRBCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.57%

-54.56%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.06%

-17.01%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.52%

-23.08%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.85%

-43.63%

+17.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.14%

-43.63%

+13.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.69%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-11.31%

+4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

5.01%

-2.95%

Volatility

TRRJX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) is 2.95%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that TRRJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRJXTRBCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

3.57%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

13.37%

-4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.45%

16.66%

-6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

24.03%

-11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.54%

22.79%

-9.25%

TRRJX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRJX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRJX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRBCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
4.97%5.25%18.16%3.49%5.87%9.38%1.19%0.36%2.44%2.94%0.67%3.26%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.36%4.68%9.67%6.89%4.80%5.68%8.55%3.80%2.89%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRRJX and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRBCX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to TRRJX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRJX dropped -53.57% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

TRRJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRJX and TRBCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer