PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRDX vs. TLZIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRDX vs. TLZIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TRRDX having a 9.77% return and TLZIX slightly lower at 9.67%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRRDX having a 10.56% annualized return and TLZIX not far ahead at 11.06%.


TRRDX

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.77%
6M
5.56%
1Y
17.41%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
10.56%

TLZIX

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.17%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.18%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRDX vs. TLZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRDX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund
9.77%12.53%13.15%19.60%-18.77%16.52%18.10%24.71%-7.41%22.03%
TLZIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund
9.67%18.86%13.52%18.98%-16.69%14.86%16.26%24.52%-6.39%18.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRDX and TLZIX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009

0.97

The correlation between TRRDX and TLZIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRDX vs. TLZIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRDX
TRRDX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TRRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

TLZIX
TLZIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TLZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TLZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRDX vs. TLZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRRDXTLZIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.07

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.26

13.59

-5.34

TRRDX vs. TLZIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the TLZIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRDX and TLZIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRRDXTLZIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.39

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.71

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.80

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.74

-0.16

Drawdowns

TRRDX vs. TLZIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRDX drawdown since its inception was -53.50%, which is greater than TLZIX's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRDX and TLZIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRDXTLZIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.50%

-28.82%

-24.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-7.77%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-12.92%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.26%

-24.21%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.46%

-28.82%

-2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.65%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-4.00%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.75%

+0.43%

Volatility

TRRDX vs. TLZIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX) have volatilities of 3.25% and 3.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRDXTLZIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

3.12%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

7.99%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

10.00%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

12.87%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.62%

13.93%

+0.69%

TRRDX vs. TLZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than TLZIX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRDX vs. TLZIX - Dividend Comparison

TRRDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLZIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund
3.48%3.82%2.49%2.11%2.62%2.93%1.95%2.26%2.68%0.18%2.64%0.31%
TRRDX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.26%5.60%8.92%7.92%4.96%6.10%9.51%3.96%3.36%4.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TRRDX and TLZIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRRDX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to TLZIX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRDX dropped -53.50% vs TLZIX's -28.82%.

TLZIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRDX and TLZIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer