PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRDX vs. LTFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRDX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRDX achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than LTFIX's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRDX has underperformed LTFIX with an annualized return of 10.56%, while LTFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.


TRRDX

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.77%
6M
5.56%
1Y
17.41%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
10.56%

LTFIX

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.92%
YTD
8.75%
6M
9.13%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRDX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRDX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund
9.77%12.53%13.15%19.60%-18.77%16.52%18.10%24.71%-7.41%22.03%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.75%17.80%17.28%20.33%-18.84%17.73%16.47%27.27%-9.03%22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRDX and LTFIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008

0.97

The correlation between TRRDX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRDX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRDX
TRRDX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TRRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

LTFIX
LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRDX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRRDXLTFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.52

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.26

11.34

-3.08

TRRDX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRDX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRRDXLTFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.85

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.73

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.46

+0.13

Drawdowns

TRRDX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRDX drawdown since its inception was -53.50%, roughly equal to the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRDX and LTFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRDXLTFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.50%

-52.73%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-8.71%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-15.70%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.26%

-26.80%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.46%

-33.50%

+2.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.83%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-7.64%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.93%

+0.25%

Volatility

TRRDX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) is 3.25%, while Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that TRRDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRDXLTFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

3.46%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

9.48%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

11.87%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

15.46%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.62%

15.84%

-1.22%

TRRDX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRDX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

TRRDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LTFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.02%8.73%8.47%4.17%8.60%5.83%3.91%6.03%6.60%3.51%3.99%4.51%
TRRDX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.26%5.60%8.92%7.92%4.96%6.10%9.51%3.96%3.36%4.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TRRDX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTFIX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to TRRDX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRDX dropped -53.50% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

LTFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRDX and LTFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer