PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRCX vs. SSBRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRCX vs. SSBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRCX achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly higher than SSBRX's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRCX has outperformed SSBRX with an annualized return of 8.49%, while SSBRX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.63% annualized return.


TRRCX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.10%
6M
4.53%
YTD
7.32%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
8.49%
ALL TIME*
8.65%

SSBRX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.07%
6M
4.36%
YTD
6.18%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
7.63%
ALL TIME*
7.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TRRCX vs. SSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRCX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund
7.32%8.23%10.73%16.36%-16.89%13.70%15.90%22.50%-6.36%19.46%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.18%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%20.73%-5.47%14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRCX and SSBRX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.95

The correlation between TRRCX and SSBRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRCX vs. SSBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRRCX
TRRCX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TRRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRRCX vs. SSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRRCXSSBRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.40

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

2.77

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

12.00

-8.46

TRRCX vs. SSBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the SSBRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRCX and SSBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRRCX vs. SSBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRCX drawdown since its inception was -52.28%, which is greater than SSBRX's maximum drawdown of -21.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRCX and SSBRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRCXSSBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.28%

-21.96%

-30.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.93%

-4.44%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.46%

-7.36%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-21.13%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.55%

-21.96%

-6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.52%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.04%

-3.68%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

1.02%

+1.37%

Volatility

TRRCX vs. SSBRX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) has a higher volatility of 2.33% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) at 1.47%. This indicates that TRRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRCXSSBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

1.47%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.50%

4.89%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

5.93%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.41%

8.86%

+2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.16%

9.75%

+2.41%

TRRCX vs. SSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRCX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBRX's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRCX vs. SSBRX - Dividend Comparison

TRRCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.71%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%
TRRCX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund
0.00%0.00%3.38%6.16%12.05%9.43%5.45%5.44%8.83%3.82%2.66%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TRRCX and SSBRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRRCX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to SSBRX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRCX dropped -52.28% vs SSBRX's -21.96%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRCX and SSBRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer