PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRCX vs. PADLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRCX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRCX achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.51% return.


TRRCX

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.09%
YTD
7.39%
6M
1.92%
1Y
11.24%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
8.74%

PADLX

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.39%
YTD
4.51%
6M
5.05%
1Y
13.15%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRCX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TRRCX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund
7.39%8.23%10.73%16.36%-16.89%13.70%15.01%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.51%10.83%8.34%11.01%-12.54%2.93%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRCX and PADLX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.85

The correlation between TRRCX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRCX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRCX
TRRCX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TRRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PADLX
PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRCX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRRCXPADLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.59

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

3.75

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

16.42

-11.46

TRRCX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRCX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRRCXPADLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.99

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.60

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.64

-0.06

Drawdowns

TRRCX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRCX drawdown since its inception was -52.28%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRCX and PADLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRCXPADLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.28%

-18.87%

-33.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.93%

-3.63%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.46%

-6.63%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-18.87%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.35%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-4.83%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

0.83%

+1.53%

Volatility

TRRCX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.54%. This indicates that TRRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRCXPADLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

1.54%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

3.63%

+4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.56%

4.56%

+5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.34%

6.66%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.24%

7.51%

+4.73%

TRRCX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRCX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRCX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

TRRCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PADLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.96%5.03%3.71%2.91%1.01%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRRCX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund
0.00%0.00%3.38%6.16%12.05%9.43%5.45%5.44%8.83%3.82%2.66%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRRCX and PADLX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRRCX has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to PADLX (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRCX dropped -52.28% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRCX and PADLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer