TRRCX vs. FDFPX
TRRCX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund) and FDFPX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, TRRCX returned 5.03%/yr vs 10.78%/yr for FDFPX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TRRCX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FDFPX.
Performance
TRRCX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRRCX achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 12.86% return.
TRRCX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.65%
FDFPX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 25.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TRRCX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRRCX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund | 7.32% | 8.23% | 10.73% | 16.36% | -16.89% | 13.70% | 15.90% | 7.38% |
FDFPX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund | 12.86% | 22.81% | 17.81% | 20.93% | -18.57% | 16.84% | 18.54% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRRCX and FDFPX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between TRRCX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRRCX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank
TRRCX
FDFPX
TRRCX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRRCX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.31 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 2.52 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.54 | 10.55 | -7.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRRCX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRRCX drawdown since its inception was -52.28%, which is greater than FDFPX's maximum drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRCX and FDFPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRRCX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.28% | -31.22% | -21.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.93% | -9.54% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.46% | -15.42% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.07% | -27.41% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -1.67% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -5.76% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 2.28% | +0.11% |
Volatility
TRRCX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) is 2.33%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that TRRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRRCX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.33% | 4.33% | -2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.50% | 12.20% | -4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 14.21% | -4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.41% | 15.33% | -3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.16% | 17.20% | -5.04% |
TRRCX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRRCX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRRCX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison
TRRCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFPX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund | 3.79% | 2.87% | 6.56% | 2.22% | 5.41% | 8.52% | 5.38% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRRCX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.38% | 6.16% | 12.05% | 9.43% | 5.45% | 5.44% | 8.83% | 3.82% | 2.66% | 3.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TRRCX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDFPX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to TRRCX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRCX dropped -52.28% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.
FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRRCX and FDFPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer